We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • RTO Insider
    • CAISO
    • ERCOT
    • MISO
    • PJM
    • ISO-NE
    • NYISO
    • SPP
    • FERC & Federal
  • ERO Insider
    • NERC & Committees
    • FERC & Federal
    • Regional Entities
    • Standards/Programs
  • NetZero Insider
    • Federal Policy
    • State & Local Policy
    • Building Decarbonization
    • Transportation Decarbonization
    • Transmission & Distribution
    • Generation & Fuels
    • Equity & Economics
    • Technology
  • Calendar
    • RTO Insider Events
    • ERO Insider Events
    • NetZero Insider Events
  • July 05, 2022
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • July 05, 2022
July 05, 2022
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Researchers: New Policies, Data Needed to Respond to Climate Threats

Researchers: New Policies, Data Needed to Respond to Climate Threats

EBA Panel Considers Life Beyond the ‘Tipping Point’

Kivalina (Alaska Dept of Transportation and Public Facilities) Alt FI.jpg
Kivalina, an Alaskan native village, has unsuccessfully sought federal funding to relocate because of sea level rise. | Alaska Dept. of Transportation and Public Facilities
Jan 13, 2022
Rich Heidorn Jr.

Government officials and utility planners lack the tools and policies needed to address climate change, despite growing awareness that it is an increasing threat to infrastructure and public health, researchers said Wednesday.

“There’s clear evidence that [severe events’] likelihood and intensity are increasing under climate change. And yet there’s very little understanding of how to model their amplified impacts on infrastructure, energy systems and communities,” Roshanak Nateghi, a Purdue University professor of industrial engineering, told an Energy Bar Association webinar.

Nateghi, whose research focuses on the resilience of energy systems, said federal relief policies that are responsive to “rapid onset events” like hurricanes fail to recognize long-term threats such as droughts, heat waves and sea level rise.

“Droughts and heat waves are amongst the most costly and lethal [events] in the U.S. Just one example is the Chicago heat wave back in 1995, where 50,000 customers lost power; over 700 people died,” she said. “And yet when you go back to the disaster relief database, you’ll see very disproportionately less … investment.”

EBA Panel 2022-01-13 (Energy Bar Association) Content.jpgClockwise from top left: Roshanak Nateghi, Purdue University; Heather Payne, Seton Hall University of Law; Judsen Bruzgul, ICF, and Michael Craig, University of Michigan | Energy Bar Association

 

Heather Payne, professor of energy and environment at the Seton Hall University School of Law, said the “poster child” for the disconnect is Kivalina, an Alaskan native village that has sought federal funding to relocate because of sea level rise “and yet has been denied that multiple times by [the Federal Emergency Management Agency] because they don’t view the impacts from climate change as within their discretion.”

Payne also cited the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 2019 decision to relicense the Turkey Point nuclear plant south of Miami through 2052 despite concerns over sea level rise.

Nateghi said FEMA’s policies encourage perverse incentives. “For FEMA to release some of those [disaster] funds … the damage needs to be a certain [number of] dollars per head. … So in a way, you’re encouraged to sustain a lot of losses … to be able to qualify.”

Lack of Data

The recognition that severe events can be longer in duration and cover a wider region demands “a different, or at least complimentary, approach to reliability, planning and investment,” said Judsen Bruzgul, senior director of climate resilience for consulting firm ICF International.

University of Michigan professor Michael Craig, who models regional power systems to test their resilience, said the industry hasn’t done enough research on how different parts of the power system will interact under extreme events.

In the past, utilities used decades of past meteorological data for planning. “That prior 40 years is not representative of what we will see in the future. … So where do I get my meteorological data now?” he asked. “The unsatisfactory answer is you get it from climate models. But the climate models were not built to give that data to utilities. They don’t capture these extreme events well. They’re not at the resolution that they want them at.”

Nateghi said utilities generally have access to some type of weather forecasting capability. “What I often find missing is a model that translates the climate impact to infrastructure impact. A lot of times I think that translation happens based on expert knowledge, which would have been fine if our climate system was stationary. But … that translation — based on gut feeling as opposed to in a data-driven way, which is guided by the physics of the infrastructure — is not always helpful.”

‘Duty to Serve’ Must Change

Payne, whose work focuses on the legal and policy changes needed for economy-wide electrification, said climate change requires a change to the common-law concept of utilities’ “duty to serve” all customers within their monopoly territory.

“As climate change alters the conditions of the natural world, utilities will find themselves in the situation where continuing to provide service, reinstalling infrastructure to provide service where it has been lost, or providing new service would be considered imprudent,” she argues in an upcoming paper.

“I take a fairly expansive view of what utilities and regulators can and should be doing,” she said Wednesday, reiterating arguments from a prior paper on what she calls the “natural gas paradox.”

“The first thing is that they need to not be making the problem worse, right? So you should not be putting any fossil fuel infrastructure into your system at this point. I mean, if you want to be part of the solution, I actually do view that it’s that simple.”

She said regulators should also repurpose existing spending on programs like energy efficiency in order to reduce ratepayers’ energy burden. “I can go to my local Home Depot, and energy efficiency money will make it so that I can purchase reduced-price LED light bulbs. I don’t think that’s necessarily the best use of our energy efficiency funds.”

Payne said she is dismayed by how little public participation there is in utility integrated resource plan proceedings. “I have looked at lots of IRP dockets where you have all of two filings: You have the initial plan that the utility put in, and you had order from the PUC accepting or adopting it. And that’s it,” she said. “Something that I think regulators need to work on is really finding more ways to have communication.”

Aligning Mitigation and Adaptation

Craig said researchers and planners don’t know yet whether it is possible to align adaptation policies with climate mitigation policies.

“These are things that we need to think of together rather than separately. These are long-lived assets: 20, 30, 40 years. So they’re going to be around as climate change intensifies.”

A carbon price that incentivized investment in low-carbon generation “does not necessarily make you more adapted to climate change,” he said. “You could be putting nuclear power plants or carbon capture and sequestration on the sea or on rivers that in 10 or 20 years … that are going to be affected by sea level rise.”

Craig said the traditional “beneficiary pays” principle of utility regulation can be unfair to those most impacted by climate change.

“You have situations where now people who are most impacted by climate change — wildfires are a perfect example — are exposed to tremendous costs, and upgrading the grid and those same communities might be the least able to fund it.

“If I have a rural community in Oregon that is now facing public safety power shutoffs, I can underground that line [at a cost of] millions of dollars. Can that community pay for it?” he said. “That is a challenge to me in terms of how we think about regulating and distributing these costs.”

ICF’s Bruzgul sees promise in the use of “adaptation pathways,” which seeks to escalate responses as the severity of climate impacts intensify rather than initially seeking the most expensive solutions.

Adaptation / Commentary & Special Reports / Public Policy / Federal Policy / FERC & Federal
KEYWORDS climate change Energy Bar Association (EBA) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) ICF International integrated resource plan (IRP) severe weather
Rich heidorn jr rto website final
Rich Heidorn Jr.

Vegetation Eyed in AEP Ohio Outages Following Storms

More from this author
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Want us to be your eyes and ears?

Let us put you "inside the room."
Sign Up Today

Popular Stories

  • PJM Orders Load Sheds in AEP Following Storms

    Jun 14, 2022
    RTO Insider
    NERC & Committees
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.
  • PJM Capacity Prices Crater

    Jun 21, 2022
    RTO Insider
    Demand Response
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.
  • Federal Briefs

    Jun 28, 2022
    RTO Insider
    By Shawn McFarland
  • AEP Under Fire as Load Sheds Persist in Ohio

    Jun 15, 2022
    RTO Insider
    Company News
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.
  • FirstEnergy’s Top Executives Face Job Reviews

    Jun 21, 2022
    RTO Insider
    Company News
    By John Funk

Upcoming Events

  • 01Jun

    NW Energy - Decarbonizing the Northwest: Webinar Series

  • 11Jul

    SPP Markets and Operations Policy Committee (MOPC)

    Westminster, CO
  • 12Jul

    PJM Planning Committee (PC)

    Audubon, PA
Tweets by rtoinsider
  • Publications
    • RTO Insider
      • CAISO
      • ERCOT
      • ISO-NE
      • MISO
      • NYISO
      • PJM
      • SPP
      • FERC & Federal
    • ERO Insider
      • NERC & Committees
      • FERC & Federal
      • Regional Entities
      • Standards & Programs
    • NetZero Insider
      • Federal Policy
      • State & Local Policy
      • Building Decarbonization
      • Transportation Decarbonization
      • Transmission & Distribution
      • Generation & Fuels
      • Equity & Economics
      • Technology
  • Additional Links
    • About Us
    • Why Subscribe?
    • FAQ
    • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us
    • Rich Heidorn Jr.
      Editor-in-Chief & Co-Publisher

      Merry Eisner
      Chief Operating Officer & Co-Publisher

      10837 Deborah Drive
      Potomac, MD 20854
      (301) 658-6885

    • Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Copyright ©2022. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing