We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
  • RTO Insider
    • CAISO
    • ERCOT
    • MISO
    • PJM
    • ISO-NE
    • NYISO
    • SPP
    • FERC & Federal
  • ERO Insider
    • NERC & Committees
    • FERC & Federal
    • Regional Entities
    • Standards/Programs
  • NetZero Insider
    • Federal Policy
    • State & Local Policy
    • Building Decarbonization
    • Transportation Decarbonization
    • Transmission & Distribution
    • Generation & Fuels
    • Equity & Economics
    • Technology
  • Calendar
    • RTO Insider Events
    • ERO Insider Events
    • NetZero Insider Events
  • May 18, 2022
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Log Out
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • May 18, 2022
May 18, 2022
  • Log In
  • Register
  • Log Out
  • My Account
Home » Stakeholders Debate OSW Ban to 75 Nautical Miles off Maine Coast

Stakeholders Debate OSW Ban to 75 Nautical Miles off Maine Coast

OSW Roadmap Working Group Still Considering Final Recommended Distance

Maine OSW roadmap (Maine Governors Energy Office) Alt FI.jpg
A document released by a working group of the Maine OSW roadmap initiative shows the group is considering a ban on OSW development 75 nautical miles from the coast. | Maine Governor’s Energy Office
Jan 30, 2022
Jennifer Delony

A working group of the Maine Offshore Wind Roadmap is considering a  request that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management bar OSW development within 75 miles of the state’s coast.

“There is strong interest in the [Fisheries Working Group] in advocating for the state to take a position on moving OSW construction further offshore … to minimize OSW development and fisheries conflict,” Meredith Mendelson, deputy commissioner of the Department of Marine Resources and co-chair of the working group said during a roadmap advisory committee meeting Friday. “We’ve had multiple discussions around this, and I expect we will continue to for some time, but we wanted to bring it forward to the advisory committee because we think this is an important issue.”

Mendelson said the group has not settled on a proposed distance for the prohibition. A document released by the working group Jan. 18, however, said the Fisheries Working Group “strongly encourages the state to advocate for BOEM and the [Gulf of Maine] Interagency Task Force to prohibit the development construction of OSW turbines within 75 nautical miles or less from the Maine coast.”

At that distance, the prohibition would easily exceed the distance of all active BOEM lease areas on the East Coast.

Vineyard Wind I, for example, is sited 30 nautical miles from the Massachusetts coast, and the lease areas recently announced by BOEM for the New York Bight range between 20 and 69 nautical miles from the New York coast.

Gov. Janet Mills signed a law last summer that prohibits new OSW development in state waters, which extend 3 nautical miles from the coast. Mills had originally proposed a 10-year moratorium on OSW in state waters, but she eventually agreed to a permanent ban to protect commercial lobster harvesting.

The Maine Governor’s Energy Office filed an application in October to lease a site in federal waters in the Gulf of Maine for a floating offshore wind research array. The preferred site, according to the application, is 25 nautical miles from the nearest point on the mainland.

Considerable engagement with members of the fishing industry went into selecting the proposed array site, according to the application. Selection of a site “no less than 17 nautical miles offshore” reduces “potential impacts on inshore fisheries,” the application said.

The call to extend the state-waters ban to federal waters would be part of a wider package of recommendations that the advisory committee will consider related to OSW development and the state’s fishing industry.

The group shared 11 initial recommendations with the committee Friday, including encouraging the state and BOEM to engage the fishing industry directly in the development of wind areas in the Gulf of Maine. In addition, the group wants to see the state initiate a port assessment as wind areas are identified to determine the implications for local port economies.

Three other working groups delivered their initial recommendations to the committee in December, and all the groups will refine their recommendations with a goal of releasing an official set of draft recommendations in July. The final roadmap is due at the end of the year.

Federal Policy / Offshore Wind Power / Maine
KEYWORDS Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) fishing industry Maine Governor’s Energy Office Maine Offshore Wind Roadmap Offshore Wind (OSW)
Jennifer delony rto website final
Jennifer Delony

RI Advocates: Fund State Transit Master Plan to Reduce VMTs

More from this author
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Popular Stories

  • Federal Aid Likely Too Late to Save Palisades, Diablo Canyon Nukes

    Apr 20, 2022
    CAISO/WEIM
    By John Lindstrom
  • Solar Sector Braces for Tariff Probe Impact

    Apr 20, 2022
    FERC & Federal
    By Hugh Morley
  • Southern Co. Takes Heat over SEEM, Opposition to RTO

    May 16, 2022
    Alabama
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.
  • Offshore Wind Conference Highlights NY, NJ Transmission Plans

    May 2, 2022
    Conference Coverage
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.
  • Humility, State Support Seen as Keys to Transmission Buildout

    May 3, 2022
    FERC
    By Rich Heidorn Jr.

Want us to be your eyes and ears?

Let us put you "inside the room."
Sign Up Today

Upcoming Events

  • 16May

    American Clean Power - Clean Power 2022

    San Antonio, TX
  • 17May

    28th Annual New England Energy Conference & Exposition

    Worcester, MA
  • 17May

    IPPNY 2022 Spring Conference

    Albany, NY
Tweets by rtoinsider
  • Publications
    • RTO Insider
      • CAISO
      • ERCOT
      • ISO-NE
      • MISO
      • NYISO
      • PJM
      • SPP
      • FERC & Federal
    • ERO Insider
      • NERC & Committees
      • FERC & Federal
      • Regional Entities
      • Standards & Programs
    • NetZero Insider
      • Federal Policy
      • State & Local Policy
      • Building Decarbonization
      • Transportation Decarbonization
      • Transmission & Distribution
      • Generation & Fuels
      • Equity & Economics
      • Technology
  • Additional Links
    • About Us
    • Why Subscribe?
    • FAQ
    • Terms
    • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
  • Contact Us
    • Rich Heidorn Jr.
      Editor-in-Chief & Co-Publisher

      Merry Eisner
      Chief Operating Officer & Co-Publisher

      10837 Deborah Drive
      Potomac, MD 20854
      (301) 658-6885

    • Facebook Twitter Linkedin
Copyright ©2022. All Rights Reserved Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing