Mystic Generating Station
A group of New England suppliers is raising worries about the costs of the cost-of-service agreement between ISO-NE and the Mystic Generating Station.
The fate of the LNG import terminal in Everett, Mass., has come into increasingly sharp focus in the last few months.
ISO-NE warns that the region’s near-term grid reliability depends on its access to LNG — and that access in turn relies on a single facility outside Boston.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued rulings relating to the Mystic Generating Station, including granting review to a group of state regulators.
Energy sector leaders in New England are already warning of a grim possible scenario for next winter.
Fletcher6, CC BY-SA-3.0, via Wikimedia
FERC voted 3-1 to reduce the base return on equity for Exelon’s Mystic Generating Station as part of its reliability-must-run agreement with ISO-NE.
Fletcher6, CC BY-SA-3.0, via Wikimedia
FERC set a base return on equity of 9.33% on the Mystic Generating Station’s reliability-must-run contract, using methodology it introduced last year.
FERC dismissed a complaint by New England generators against Exelon's Mystic cost-of-service agreement.
FERC made additional alterations to its orders approving ISO-NE’s cost-of-service contract with Exelon’s Mystic Generating Station.
The NECA Fuels Conference tackled the subject of natural gas bans by local governments, questioning if they are necessary to transition to clean energy.
Want more? Advanced Search