Competitive transmission developers made an argument at OPSI’s annual meeting: Supplemental projects undermine regional planning efforts.

Stakeholders tell PJM's Board of Managers a proposed Tariff attachment from incumbent transmission owners would violate the RTO’s governing documents.

PJM’s Planning Committee deferred voting on a proposal regarding critical infrastructure mitigation projects for a webinar planned to discuss transparency.

The PJM Planning Committee rejected a proposal to bring end-of-life supplemental projects under the purview of the RTO’s regional planning process.

PJM must open Form 715 transmission projects to competitive bidding, with regional cost sharing involving high-voltage lines, FERC ordered.

PJM stakeholders are concerned that a proposed Tariff filing by transmission owners could undermine FERC-ordered transparency rules for certain projects.

PJM and its stakeholders reached an agreement on manual language detailing how the RTO will remove supplemental projects from its RTEP.

PJM stakeholders struck a compromise on language that would expand upon how the RTO includes projects in its Regional Transmission Expansion Plan.

Electric distributors want PJM transmission owners to reveal more about how they decide when it’s time to replace infrastructure at “the end of its life.”

PJM staff unveiled to the Planning Committee a proposed new fee structure for a more involved cost-containment process.