We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
By Rory D. Sweeney PJM is at odds with some stakeholders over whether existing units should be under the same obligation to provide primary frequency response (PFR) that FERC ordered for new units in February. Sides clashed at last week’s meeting of the Primary Frequency Response Senior Task Force (PFRSTF)...
This article is for registered users or paid subscribers ONLY. Want to be one? You can register here and check out our subscription plans here. We'd love to be your eyes and ears.
