Search
February 4, 2026

Western Market Seams Complicate Data Center, Clean Energy Investments, Panelists Say

As the West appears to move toward two separate day-ahead markets, data center developers like Google and clean energy companies are investing with the intent to mitigate seams and ensure operational consistency, panelists at an Advanced Energy United webinar said.

Representatives from Google, Leap Energy and Pattern Energy discussed the newly incorporated Regional Organization for Western Energy (ROWE) during a Feb. 3 webinar in conjunction with the release of a new AEU report on the advantages of a unified Western market.

ROWE is expected to assume governance over CAISO’s energy markets — the Western Energy Imbalance Market (WEIM) and soon-to-be-launched Extended Day-Ahead Market (EDAM). (See Pathways’ ROWE Incorporated in Delaware, Board Search Underway.)

The West-Wide Governance Pathways Initiative created ROWE as an independent organization to remove what some see as a barrier to wider participation in WEIM and EDAM by ensuring they are not governed predominantly by officials and stakeholders in California.

However, EDAM is not the only day-ahead market under development. Despite ROWE, a significant number of entities have opted to join SPP’s Markets+, which is scheduled to go live in 2027. (See BPA Outlines Next Steps in Markets+ Implementation.)

For Google, the split between EDAM and Markets+ could make moving clean energy “complicated and expensive,” according to Sydney Henry, the company’s data center strategic negotiator.

“This fragmentation will make specific clean firm projects financially unviable if we have to cross market borders to reach our key investments, in this case, likely our data center investments,” Henry said.

One issue is the market seams that will arise between EDAM and Markets+. The seams are created by different policies and separate dispatch between neighboring markets, which can result in additional costs for transferring energy across the boundary.

Google now looks at its data center investments in the context of how markets are likely to be structured and how to mitigate seams risk by, for example, ensuring that power purchase agreements are “in the same market or within the same structure as the data center,” she said.

“That’s always opportune, because then they’re operating under the same rules and the same constraints,” Henry said. “So, it’s both an opportunity and a bit of a risk mitigation effort as we continue to see how the different states land and the different utilities land within their preferences. But I think it would definitely be preferable, from our perspective, to have it as regionalized and stable as possible.”

Meanwhile, independent governance reduces seams costs and regulatory friction, which is important for large-scale energy investors like Google, Henry noted.

“We are investing in new markets,” she said. “This isn’t investments that we were maybe seeing five or 10 years ago in the couple million dollars. It’s now billions of dollars of investments.”

Resource Developer Challenges

Jack Wadleigh, senior regulatory and market affairs manager at clean energy developer Pattern Energy, likewise said the “multi-market landscape” introduces challenges for both existing projects and meeting contractual obligations.

Changes to Pattern’s settlement points within the markets for resources that are “pseudo-tied or dynamically scheduled” can significantly impact developers, Wadleigh said.

“And these issues are kind of ongoing, especially when we talk about things like congestion, revenues and whether you’re settling with the market operator or settling with the balancing area,” he said. “So, these are all kind of high-priority topics for Pattern as we’re thinking about the future state as we go into a world with multiple markets in the West.”

Instead of having a standardized approach, market fragmentation forces providers to adapt to the different markets’ bidding rules, timelines and performance metrics, according to Collin Smith, regulatory affairs manager at Leap Energy.

Smith sits on Pathways’ nominating committee as a representative of the distributed energy resources sector. (See Pathways to Engage Broad Set of Stakeholders to Select Independent RO Board.)

Leap’s operations are “largely limited to California because of the difficulty of integrating across multiple different types of participation in other states.”

“If you are creating multiple markets across the region, you’re just slowing down the ability for companies like Leap to be able to operate in those areas and make use of the different technologies that are already being adapted by customers across the West for their own purposes … losing the ability for those to be quickly integrated into the grid,” Smith said.

FERC Oversight Hearing Focuses on Affordability and Reliability

WASHINGTON — All five FERC commissioners faced questions from the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Energy on how to balance reliability and affordability as demand grows.

“FERC stands at a critical juncture in history, domestically and in the world,” FERC Chair Laura Swett told the subcommittee during an oversight hearing Feb. 3. “We’re in a global energy arms race created by the rise of technology, its tremendous load growth, and our push to onshore manufacturing and jobs. I want the United States to lead that race.”

FERC is working to streamline its processes, cut connection times and ensure efficient, durable infrastructure development, she added.

The commission’s main job is to deliver affordable and reliable energy for Americans while upholding Congress’ vision for a bipartisan, independent and resource-neutral regulator, Commissioner David Rosner said. That is easier said than done, especially with all the changes the industries it regulates are facing, he said.

“Our energy systems face these pressures at a time when families and small businesses have been struggling with high prices, including their utility bills,” Rosner said. “While meeting this moment presents challenges, it also creates opportunities for us to modernize America’s energy infrastructure.”

To submit a commentary on this topic, email forum@rtoinsider.com.

While the demand growth, largely from data centers, does present the opportunity to modernize the grid in a way that increases reliability and efficiency, FERC has work to do to make that a reality, Commissioner Judy Chang said.

“To date, the system buildout has contributed to high prices for customers, whose utility rates have already increased in recent years due to other factors,” she said. “Thus, as regulators, the commission has a responsibility to guide the industry’s efforts towards cost-effective and durable solutions that address these pressing challenges while protecting customers from adverse reliability and cost impacts.”

The hearing was held as the district is still digging out from the late January winter storm, and many members of Congress noted it took out power to more than 1 million customers. Ranking Member Kathy Castor (D-Fla.) noted that the storm knocked out some transmission lines owned by the Tennessee Valley Authority. But the bulk power system largely held throughout the winter weather, FERC Commissioner Lindsay See said.

“Though information is still coming in, I’m encouraged to see good results from better winterization and prep work, and coordinating across the gas and electric industries,” See said. “We have more to do in these areas, but the progress so far is real.”

Subcommittee Chair Bob Latta (R-Ohio) asked his standard question of whether the U.S. needs more power — to which all five commissioners answered “yes” — before asking Swett how FERC is working to ensure regulatory certainty to help that happen.

“We are taking a hard, holistic look at the open items at FERC,” Swett answered. “First of all, I shut down quite a few lingering dockets at my first meeting with the help of my colleagues here. That is one way to eliminate uncertainty that has come from previous administrations. Another way is to end the flip-flopping of FERC’s regulatory paradigm and the uncertainty that’s created by increasing regulation that has built up over the years that far exceeds what FERC’s mission is under the law.”

Castor asked what FERC was doing to speed up the interconnection of new power plants on the grid.

Chang answered that the commission has been working on that for years, with Order 2023 requiring a first-ready, first-served approach with cluster studies for interconnecting projects. Progress is being made to speed up the queues, she said.

“No matter how fast we can study the projects in the generation interconnection process, one of the bottlenecks I talked about in my opening statement is the transmission system,” Chang said. “So, if the transmission system is not ready, or if it’s inadequate for interconnecting the generator and the load, that becomes the bottleneck.”

Affordability was the focus of many questions, with Swett noting that the aspects of the power system that FERC regulates are responsible for about one-third of the average customer’s bill.

“Increasingly Americans are struggling in paying those utility bills,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said. “In 2024, more than a third of households skipped out on necessities to pay an energy bill, and close to a quarter of households kept their homes at hazardous temperatures to avoid the cost of heating or cooling. Yet the energy utilities charging Americans are among some of the most powerful and profitable companies on earth.”

She then started asking Swett questions about the average return on equity FERC approves for utilities engaged in interstate commerce. She ran short of time for questions, but later Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio) picked up where she left off.

“Most Americans don’t know how much power you all have in terms of adjusting down the profit margin in order to adjust down some of these utility bills,” Landsman said.

He asked Swett what kind of debates FERC is having about lowering power bills for consumers considering their ability to trim utility profits.

“The heated debate we are having is a contest to see who can save ratepayers more money,” Swett said. “Every time we have a docket come before us, every single one of them has raised, ‘Well could we lower this, or can we lower that? How is this going to pass through to consumers?’”

Landsman then asked how quickly FERC could act to lower utility profits by trimming their rates.

“Every single rate that comes before us, we do look at what rate of return the utility has,” Swett said. “And that can help Americans, but like I said, that’s only one-third of the bill that they pay every month.”

BPA to Revamp Public Involvement Policy

Forty years after adopting a public involvement policy, the Bonneville Power Administration is reviewing the document with an eye toward modernizing it.

BPA held a workshop Feb. 3 to start gathering feedback on the 16-page policy, issued in 1986.

“It is quite aged. There are things in it that are not really part of how anybody does business anymore,” said Kim Thompson, BPA’s vice president of Northwest requirements marketing.

The policy was written before the arrival of spellcheck, and one task will be to correct typos.

At the same time, BPA wants to rewrite the policy so it holds up in coming years despite changes such as technology advancements.

BPA wrote the policy in response to requirements of the 1980 Northwest Power Act. The policy applies to “major regional power policy formulation.” It also allows for varying levels of public involvement on issues such as transmission, renewable resources, energy conservation, and fish and wildlife.

The public involvement policy exempts certain other processes, such as ratemaking and major resource acquisition, which follow their own specific procedures. The policy also preserves the BPA administrator’s discretion to react quickly when warranted.

BPA plans to review the 1986 document’s definition of “major regional power policy,” as well as the list of exemptions. Tariff changes under the Federal Power Act are a possible new exemption.

Another area for review is the best method for publishing notices of intent. Depending on the situation, BPA might publish a notice in the Federal Register, mail it to landowners or use another means.

One workshop participant said it would be helpful to Bonneville’s “core audience” if notices were included in BPA tech forums — an email distribution group — even if they’re published in other ways.

Another attendee asked if notices could include links to relevant documents so stakeholders could get a head start on reviewing materials.

A section that’s being eyed for deletion pertains to public comment forums, in which members of the public gather to comment on an issue in person. A verbatim transcript of the forum is then prepared to be added to the record.

Although BPA still occasionally holds a public comment forum, written comments have become the standard.

The 1986 policy specifies a 30-day window for submitting written public comments, a period that allowed for mailing materials back and forth, BPA representatives said. Even though comments may now be submitted more quickly by electronic means, workshop participants seemed to favor keeping the comment period at 30 days.

“It’s not just about the time it takes to review and write comments,” said Fred Heutte, senior policy associate with the NW Energy Coalition. “Many organizations have internal processes that they have to go through to respond to an important formal proposal by Bonneville.”

BPA plans to hold at least one additional workshop on its public involvement policy. A draft policy would then be released in early April followed by a public comment period. BPA hopes to finalize the policy around July 1.

Feedback on the scope of policy changes may be submitted by Feb. 11 to communications@bpa.gov.

ERAS Tour: Hi, It’s Me, I’m the Planning Problem

By Simon Mahan

Picture this: It’s late on a school night and a kid asks their parents for a last-minute trip to the store. There’s a project due the next day, and without an emergency run to the market, disaster looms. What follows is familiar: some back-and-forth about how this happened, a short lecture on procrastination and finally a reluctant agreement to make an exception.

Lately, it’s hard not to feel like state and federal energy regulators are playing this game, facing utilities that waited too long and now insist everything is urgent.

A clear example is FERC’s recent approval of ERAS processes in both MISO and SPP (the Expedited Resource Addition Study and Expedited Resource Adequacy Study, respectively). These new processes allow certain power plants to effectively jump the interconnection line, skipping ahead of hundreds of other projects already waiting their turn. (See FERC Dismisses Rehearing Ask for SPP’s ERAS Process.)

When ERAS was proposed through stakeholder processes, the underlying rationale was widely understood: Utilities had not planned far enough ahead, particularly for new natural gas plants, and now wanted a faster path forward.

To submit a commentary on this topic, email forum@rtoinsider.com.

When ERAS was proposed in 2024, MISO and SPP together had more than 300 GW of generation projects in their queues. The vast majority were wind, solar and battery storage by competitive developers, with relatively little natural gas by the utilities. In fact, MISO’s queue grew so large that the grid operator was forced to cap new entries altogether. Yet at the same time, utilities and planners began warning of an imminent reliability crisis.

Simon Mahan

Integrated resource planning (IRP) processes exist specifically to avoid this outcome. Many utilities conduct IRPs every two to three years to forecast demand and identify future resource needs. Those plans routinely show large additions of solar, wind and battery storage, often alongside some natural gas.

The labyrinth of interconnection studies can take three to four years. Renewable projects often can be built in one to two years once contracted. Natural gas plants frequently take much longer. Utilities know this all too well, yet many failed to submit gas projects early enough to align with their own forecasts.

Now, with electricity demand rising from data centers, industrial growth and electrification, utilities are asking regulators to let them cut in line.

MISO already has received more than 60 ERAS project requests, with nearly three-quarters of the proposed megawatts coming from natural gas. These projects often skip competitive solicitations, too. They are self-identified by utilities as “needed” and advanced on an expedited basis. Entergy alone has submitted more than 8,500 MW of gas generation through ERAS. (See MISO Accepts 6 GW of Mostly Gas Gen in 2nd Queue Fast Lane Class.)

Traditionally, state commissions approve new power plants only after reviewing a full certificate application, including cost estimates, alternatives analysis and transmission impacts. ERAS turns that structure upside down. Under these expedited processes, regulators are asked to effectively bless projects before a formal application is even filed. Once a project receives accelerated interconnection treatment, it becomes far harder to later reject it or disallow its costs.

After all, once you’re already standing in the checkout line with emergency school supplies in hand, it’s difficult for a parent to say, “You’re on your own, kid.”

In this case, tens of billions of dollars are at stake.

To be clear, ERAS technically is resource neutral. Wind, solar, battery storage, gas and even nuclear projects are eligible. A few have been submitted. But they pale in comparison to the surge of utility-owned, non-competitively selected natural gas plants now racing ahead of the queue.

Fast-tracking these projects risks rewarding exactly the behavior regulators should be discouraging.

So, what can regulators do instead? Here are three practical solutions:

    • IRPs must be more than a paper exercise. They provide value only if regulators are actively engaged, assumptions are realistic, load forecasts are transparent and modeling reflects real-world timelines.
    • Competitive procurement is essential. Requiring utilities to issue requests for proposals ensures that regulators and consumers can see what the market is offering. Competition disciplines costs. Sole-source generation does not.
    • Diversification and transmission expansion must remain central to reliability planning. A grid built around a narrow set of resources is inherently more fragile, not less. Maybe there’s merit in a connect and manage interconnection option, like what ERCOT has.

ERAS may be described as a temporary emergency valve, but history suggests that “temporary” exceptions have a way of becoming permanent precedents.

If regulators aren’t careful, today’s emergency trip won’t be the last time.

And that’s a lesson ratepayers shouldn’t be forced to pay for.

Simon Mahan is executive director of the Southern Renewable Energy Association.

Tiny U.S. Geothermal Sector Poised for Growth

The geothermal electricity sector continues its slow growth in the U.S., but the cost of next-generation technology has fallen sharply, setting the stage for wider expansion.

The 99 U.S. plants online in 2024 had a combined nameplate capacity of 3.97 GW, up 8% from 2020, a new report indicates.

Over the same time frame, the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for conventional geothermal technology held relatively steady at $63 to $74/MWh for flash plants and $90 to $110/MWh for binary plants. With reported geothermal power purchase agreements running in the $70-to-$99/MWh range, the authors say, these LCOEs are considered investable for a firm, high-capacity factor source of electricity.

While the LCOE for enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) remained significantly higher — as much as $200/MWh in 2024, depending on technology — it was close to $500/MWh just three years earlier.

Recent advances could lower the cost of EGS to the level of conventional geothermal technology by the mid-2030s, the authors write.

The details come in the “2025 U.S. Geothermal Market Report,” issued in January by the former National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and nonprofit advocacy group Geothermal Rising.

The levelized cost of electricity from enhanced geothermal systems decreased sharply from 2021 to 2024. | National Laboratory of the Rockies

The Trump administration recently renamed NREL the National Laboratory of the Rockies, an indication and reflection of its energy priorities. However, geothermal energy is among the few components of the renewable energy sector in favor with the current administration amid its push for more oil, gas and coal combustion.

Recent advances in oil and gas extraction techniques have brought down drilling costs in that sector. While geothermal drilling remains more expensive than oil and gas drilling, its costs have declined as well, which is important — drilling accounts for 29 to 57% of the total cost of developing a geothermal field, according to the report, which is an expansion of a 2021 NREL report.

However great its potential, geothermal was a minimally used resource in 2024, accounting for only 15,407 of the 4,308,634 GWh of electricity generated nationwide in all utility-scale sectors, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The 8% increase in U.S. geothermal generation from 2020 to 2024 was higher than the 7.4% increase for all types of utility-scale generation over the same period.

U.S. geothermal power generation is concentrated in the Southwest. | National Laboratory of the Rockies

Geothermal nonetheless remained one of the least used technologies — wood and other biomass fuels were burned to make three times as many watts as geothermal generated in 2024.

But the report makes an optimistic case for the potential of the earth’s heat to generate more electricity and to heat or cool more structures in the United States.

It indicates the number of geothermal projects in development increased from 54 in 2020 to 64 in 2024 as research improved replicable EGS processes with substantial decreases in drilling time.

As of late 2025, 29 states had enacted geothermal incentive policies, 17 of which encourage geothermal electricity production.

The authors further present geothermal as a component of U.S. energy security and independence: a potential power plant for data centers, a potential option for hybridization with thermal storage and a potential source of critical materials from the extracted underground brine.

A recent analysis by the laboratory estimated 27 to 57 TW of EGS potential at a depth of 0.62 to 4.3 miles across the continental U.S. Approximately 4.4 TW of that is in areas under federal management, but only about 1% of it would be considered economically developable.

California and Nevada remained the center of the U.S. geothermal sector as of 2024, the sites respectively of 53 and 32 of the nation’s 99 facilities.

Wis. PSC Staff: We Energies’ Data Center Rate Plan Lacks Consumer Safeguards

Analysts with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin said ratepayers are at risk of subsidizing data centers if We Energies’ proposed rate framework for data centers is given the go-ahead as proposed.

We Energies in late 2025 proposed a framework for customers requiring 500 MW or more to subscribe to dedicated resources, poised to be mostly natural gas at this point.

The utility proposed two types of electricity subscriptions for very large customers: The first would allow data centers to take all of a resource’s output provided they cover all costs associated with the resource; the second would allow data centers to count a resource toward their capacity needs. In the second case, data centers would foot the bill on 75% of the specified resource’s fixed costs; other customers would cover the remaining 25% plus all fuel costs. We Energies theorized that MISO market revenues would be enough to offset the expenses allocated to other customers (6630-TE-113).

Data centers that enroll would be bound to an initial, minimum 10-year contract, renewed thereafter in one-year increments. The rate styles contain early termination provisions where data centers could be billed for unrecovered capital costs if the resources don’t find other customers.

To submit a commentary on this topic, email forum@rtoinsider.com.

Staff with the commission flagged consumer protection weak spots in We Energies’ filing in late January. They said without stronger protection, utility customers could financially support data centers’ grid needs. They said the 75/25 allocation and 10-year contract term were cause for concern.

Andrew Field, a utility auditor with the commission, said We Energies didn’t capture the full range of market price volatility in its assumption that its other customers wouldn’t underwrite data centers. In testimony, he said We Energies didn’t “provide much detail supporting the specific future scenarios, or potential alternatives, upon which the provided analyses are based.”

Field said We Energies’ own analyses show the potential for costs to exceed benefits for the general rate base.

Even with the hopeful scenarios in its analyses, Field said We Energies found a net benefit for non-participating customers in only 67% of cases that include We Energies’ pending Foundry Ridge turbine project and 81% of the cases that include its planned Red Oak Ridge turbine project.

Tyler Meulemans, a utility financial analyst with the PSC, said he harbors concerns with the 10-year term, including a data center’s “ramp-up period,” when projected load isn’t fully realized. He said including the ramp-up period raises concerns over whether the agreement length is “sufficient to cover the costs incurred to provide service” of a massive data center.

Meulemans said when PSC staff requested a demonstration of revenue recovery would look like during a ramp-up period, We Energies’ analysis showed that a 10-year term “would not cover all costs.”

Two data center projects in We Energies’ territory — Microsoft’s AI data center campus in Mount Pleasant, Wis., and the Vantage/Oracle/OpenAI facility in Port Washington, Wis. — are to double We Energies’ load by 2030. We Energies’ investor presentations show the utility is prepared to spend $19.3 billion on new generation through 2029.  The increase of more than $6 billion is due to increasing data center demand.

The Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin and Power Forward Wisconsin, the latter of which is composed of clean energy groups, oppose the 75/25 allocation and have called on the PSC to make sure data centers pay for all the costs they cause.

Sierra Club’s Jeremy Fisher was critical of the utilities’ proposed rates and said they relied on assumptions that are too rosy.

Fisher said the rate structures “appear to have been negotiated and designed with the company’s new data center customers, Microsoft and Vantage/Oracle,” and rely on the assumptions that immense data centers will become profitable and future customers would have massive electricity needs and the means to finance them.

Fisher asked what happens if the AI boom fizzles.

We Energies “may look at these customers as an enormous opportunity to increase its rate base and expand operations, but the purpose of the tariffs must not only be to provide for reasonable allocation under optimistic conditions but ensure that incumbent ratepayers are protected under adverse scenarios,” Fisher said in testimony to the PSC.

Fisher also said the rates would lead to an “inconsistent and balkanized planning process that should be deeply concerning to regulators in assessing actual resource requirements.”

Richard Stasik, vice president of regulatory affairs of We Energies’ parent company, said PSC staff and interest groups ignored We Energies’ statutory obligation to serve all customers. He said the Sierra Club didn’t quantify risks wrought by data centers and didn’t acknowledge that the situation would be riskier without a dedicated rate schedule.

Stasik said We Energies existing customers would pay at least $1.5 billion in additional capital investments if large customers were to take service under the utility’s existing rate designs.

ACEG Transmission Planning Report Card Gives Higher Grades for RTO Reforms

Recent policy changes in regional transmission planning have improved most of the ISO/RTO scores in the latest iteration of Americans for a Clean Energy Grid’s Transmission Planning and Development Report Card. (See ACEG Report Checks in on Regional Planning After Order 1920.)

ACEG said the reforms are starting to improve outcomes in several regions, but rising demand from data centers, manufacturing and electrification are increasing the cost of delay, especially where planning processes remain incremental or reactive.

“Progress is real, but it’s uneven — and demand growth means delay now carries real costs for customers,” ACEG Executive Director Christina Hayes said in a statement. “Where regions have embraced proactive, long-term planning, we’re seeing better results. Where planning remains fragmented, reliability risks and costs increasingly show up in household electricity bills.”

Grades assess performance at the regional level and do not assign responsibility to single institutions, instead reflecting the collective actions of utilities, regional planning organizations, states and other stakeholders. To earn top grades, regions must adopt proactive, long-term, scenario-based planning that evaluates multiple system benefits, integrates regional and interregional needs, and delivers transmission at the pace required to meet rising demand.

CAISO, MISO and SPP continue to show the benefits of proactive, long-term regional planning. SPP’s Coordinated Planning Process, once approved by FERC, would be an important reform that merges transmission planning and generator interconnection planning, the report said.

ISO-NE, NYISO and PJM have shown meaningful improvement due to FERC Order 1920 compliance filings and greater engagement with states.

ERCOT got a C, with the report highlighting the Permian Basin Reliability plan to electrify oil and gas drilling and data centers, which was released in July 2024 with options for 345-Kv and a 765-Kv portfolio. The Texas PUC picked the 765-Kv option in April 2025. While Texas has seen plenty of transmission planned, the report noted it still is done in a “siloed” style, which kept it from a higher grade.

Many regions — including all the non-RTO regions — “continue to face significant gaps in both regional and interregional planning frameworks,” the report said, “In these regions, transmission development often occurs through individual utility investments or ad hoc coordination rather than durable, region-scale planning processes, limiting the ability to fully capture systemwide benefits.”

The West, which is split into three regions, is meeting under the Western Transmission Expansion Coalition (WestTEC), a voluntary interregional planning process that the report called “one of the best interregional transmission planning practices in the country.”

The first report card from ACEG came out in 2023 and ranked the regions before Order 1920 was issued, while the second one from 2024 did not change the grades and checked in after that order. Now, the report takes the requirements from Order 1920 and adds a new focus on interregional transmission.

Load growth forecasts have changed significantly since the last report, with Grid Strategies’ summary of nationwide, five-year peak load forecasts going from 24 GW three years ago to 150 GW in its most recent update. Load growth is affecting transmission development, with FERC saying it was the main driver for 1,000 miles of new facilities in 2024.

“While today’s load growth can tempt a crisis‑response mindset focused solely on short‑term fixes, the industry must move beyond ad hoc solutions and embrace long‑term regional and interregional planning,” the report said. “Proactive, holistic long‑term planning that also accommodates near‑term needs has proven to deliver the lowest costs to consumers. It captures economies of scale that ‘just‑in‑time’ projects miss and enables high‑capacity upgrades to come online ahead of demand.”

The report looked at interregional planning and gave the country an overall “C-minus” that reflects continued reliance on voluntary coordination rather than a formal requirement for regions to implement interregional planning best practices capable of finding the highest value projects.

“The takeaway is not that nothing is working,” Hayes said. “Transmission planning works when it’s proactive, coordinated and long term. The challenge now is scaling those successes fast enough — across and between regions — to keep electricity affordable and reliable for all Americans as demand continues to grow.”

Federal Briefs

U.S. Officially Leaves Paris Climate Agreement

The United States officially left the Paris Agreement – for a second time – on Jan. 27, becoming the only country in the world to abandon the international commitment to slow global warming.

The departure from the climate accord comes one year after President Donald Trump signed an executive order to begin the process of withdrawal.

The U.S. is currently the planet’s second largest climate polluter after China.

More: The New York Times; POLITICO

FERC Approves Transco Natural Gas Expansion

FERC authorized Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company to proceed with its Southeast Supply Enhancement Project, a major expansion of its existing interstate natural gas transmission system spanning Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia and Alabama.

The order grants Transco authority to construct and operate approximately 55 miles of new large-diameter pipeline, along with significant compressor station upgrades and related facilities.

FERC staff concluded that while construction and operation would result in some environmental impacts, the effects would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with mitigation measures in place.

More: Pipeline & Gas Journal

Court Says DOE Climate Group Violated Law

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled the Department of Energy violated the law when it formed the Climate Working Group.

The court issued a judgment that said the creation of the group, which is comprised of five climate change skeptics, violated the law that governs how federal advisory committees work. The Environmental Defense Fund and Union of Concerned Scientists sued the DOE in 2025 for convening the working group without public meetings or notice.

More: Reuters

Company Briefs

Dominion Installs 1st CVOW Turbine

Dominion Energy’s $11.2 billion Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind project off Virginia Beach’s coast reached a major milestone on Jan. 21 with the installation of the first turbine.

The tower was installed less than a week after the utility won a preliminary injunction in federal court, allowing it to resume construction on the project.

More: Virginia Business

TerraForm Buys 1.56-GW Solar Project in Illinois

TerraForm Power, an affiliate of Brookfield Asset Management, announced the acquisition of a 1.56-GW solar project in Illinois from its original developer, Hexagon Energy.

The Steward Creek Solar project recently sealed a 600-MW interconnection agreement between TerraForm, Commonwealth Edison and PJM.

The financials of the deal were not disclosed.

More: Renewables Now

State Briefs

INDIANA

URC Approves I&M Power Plan

The Utility Regulatory Commission approved Indiana Michigan Power’s (I&M) latest Expedited Generation Resource Plan.

Under the agreement, I&M will shift its focus from building several new natural gas plants to generation sourced by a mix of gas plants, power purchase agreements, wind, solar and battery storage. The plan also highlights a proposal to develop a virtual power plant program that would allow customers to connect their personal generation to the grid.

I&M says the plan is necessary due since electricity demand is expected to double from 2025 to 2030.

More: WPTA

LOUISIANA

New Orleans City Council Bans Data Center Development for 1 Year

The New Orleans City Council voted unanimously to ban the construction of data centers in the city for one year.

The special meeting to consider the future of data center development projects was called shortly after news broke about a proposed data center in New Orleans East. The ban period will provide the council with time to define data centers and devise a way to effectively prohibit them.

Hours after the council meeting concluded, the developer behind the New Orleans East project pulled his zoning permit.

More: WWNO

MAINE

Committee Advances Climate Superfund

The Environment and Natural Resources Committee voted 8-4 to advance a proposal that would establish a superfund for large fossil fuel companies to pay for infrastructure repairs, resiliency efforts and other costs in communities disproportionately affected by flooding and other disasters.

It would cost about $4 million to fully implement the program. Additional staff would also be required, though the exact number would depend on the specific plan.

The bill heads to the Senate.

More: Maine Morning Star

MARYLAND

State Further Behind on Emissions Goal than Expected

Modeling done by the University of Maryland’s Center for Global Sustainability indicates the state is not on track to meet its mandated 60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2031.

The data suggest state and federal policies currently on the books will reduce globe-warming emissions only 42% from 2006 levels. The same group of researchers predicted in 2023 that the state would reduce its carbon emissions 50% by 2031 — still shy of the 60% goal set by law, but better than the new estimate.

In a statement, the Department of the Environment said it still has five years to “make smart decisions, do the right thing and take advantage of technological advances.”

More: Maryland Matters

MASSACHUSETTS

Utilities Back off Plan to Charge Customers Interest on Bill Reductions

National Grid and Eversource, the state’s largest gas and electric companies, said they will forgo all interest on the bill reductions requested by Gov. Maura Healey. Berkshire Gas and Unitil agreed to do the same.

Healey requested the utilities shave customer bills by 10% in February and March amid a second winter of sky-high heating charges and was frustrated the companies had planned to collect interest. Initially, the companies said they would forgive two months of interest but planned to collect the remaining deferred charges with interest up to the prime rate of 6.75%.

More: WCVB

MICHIGAN

Consumers Energy Proposes Storage Project on Former Coal Site

The Hampton Township Planning Commission will review a special use permit request from Consumers Energy for a battery energy storage system at the site of the former Weadock coal-fired generation facility.

The $70 million Weadock Battery Energy Storage System would occupy approximately 5 acres and would include a 45-MW storage facility with 36 lithium iron phosphate batteries. The township is already home to part of an 80-MW solar farm on Consumers Energy property.

The commission will hold a public hearing Feb. 12.

More: MLive

SOUTH DAKOTA

Eminent Domain Restrictions Advance to Senate

The House of Representatives voted 62-5 to advance a measure that would ask voters to restrict eminent domain in a state constitutional amendment.

The legislation asks voters to approve an amendment clarifying eminent domain “may not be exercised for the purpose of transferring private property to a non-governmental entity solely to promote economic development or increase tax revenue without the provision of a public use.” The measure would not ban eminent domain completely.

If the Senate approves the measure, it will go to voters in the Nov. 3 general election.

More: South Dakota Searchlight

VIRGINIA

Bill to Boost Local Approvals of Solar Projects Advances

The Senate voted 21-17 to advance a bill that would set up a framework for siting solar projects that localities could follow and prohibit the premature rejection of development.

The bill is not a mandate for localities to approve projects, but it would keep them from outright barring the projects from even applying for permits. Localities would still be able to approve or withhold permits. 

The bill now heads to the House.

More: Virginia Mercury

WISCONSIN

Kewaunee Site Owner Plans to Restart Plant

EnergySolutions, the company that owns the decommissioned Kewaunee Power Station, said it plans to bring nuclear power generation back to the site.

EnergySolutions submitted a notice of intent to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Jan. 15, confirming plans to file for major licensing action for new nuclear power generation at the Kewaunee plant site by June 2028. The plant closed in 2013 and began major dismantlement in 2022.

If the site comes back online, it would be one of only two nuclear facilities in Wisconsin and the first to open since 1974.

More: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel