Search
December 21, 2025

EEI Panelists Predict Protracted Economic Recovery

Experts this week said 2020’s impacts on the energy sector will be lasting, predicting a gradual economic recovery but swifter and permanent social transformation.

Utilities’ financial outlooks are steady but fragile as 2020 wanes, panelists said during the final two sessions of Edison Electric Institute’s 55th Financial Conference on Wednesday.

“What’s the saying? May you live in interesting times,” joked Brandon Presley, outgoing president of National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners and a member of the Mississippi Public Service Commission. He added that he never thought he would conduct NARUC business from a Mississippi conference room for an entire year.

American Electric Power Executive Vice President Lisa Barton said that in March, her company was already agility testing for telework opportunities when social distancing mandates wiped out office commutes.

Economic recovery
Lisa Barton, AEP | EEI

“And we haven’t been back to the office since,” she said.

Leslie Rich, managing director of J.P. Morgan Asset Management, said electric utilities were quick to cut costs after a steep decline in demand in March and April.

She said the question remains on how long lowered demand will persist into 2021 and how regulators will consider that when utilities’ rate cases come before them.

“Revenues are down, sales are down and [operations and maintenance] are down,” Rich said.

Fitch Ratings Senior Director Barbara Chapman agreed that the recession will need to be factored into upcoming rate cases. She said Fitch initially forecasted a quadrupling of bad debt among electric utilities that fortunately did not come to pass. She also said Fitch under-forecasted residential energy demand in the pandemic’s early phases.

“But certainly there’s things on the horizon to give us concern,” Chapman said.

Rich warned that winter will bring the heftiest utility bills, as home and business heating ramps up.

“You don’t want to see customers get buried by their arrearages,” she said, but she added that utilities have been “creative” so far in keeping a steady cash flow.

NARUC remains opposed to a national moratorium on utility shutoffs for the remainder of the pandemic, Presley said.

“State regulators did not have to be prodded by anyone. … Nobody rang our phones and said, ‘You have to step up.’ We did it out of our own volition,” Presley said. “State regulators are on the ground and listening to health and human service departments and wisely making decisions in their respective jurisdictions.”

He also warned that “what works in New York may not work in North Carolina, and what works in North Carolina may not work in North Dakota.”

“The worst thing we could have happened is a fast and loose national policy that wasn’t tailored to constituents. Utilities have to have a heart, not just a head, and regulators have shown that. … But bills do have to get paid.”

Barton said when AEP has lifted shutoff moratoriums, it has been “pleasantly surprised” by customers’ willingness to enroll in payment plans. “It’s often people that have never been in this kind of situation before.”

Chapman said utilities generally want to avoid any “PR nightmares” and the perception of callousness as they resume disconnections.

New York Public Service Commissioner Diane Burman agreed with Presley about a national moratorium, but she warned that customers are incurring balances that they might not be able to pay off.

“We have to realize that there is growing debt on customers not being able to pay these bills,” she said. Regulators and utilities should enact measures such as deferred payment plans and investigate the fallout from shuttered businesses that will never cover their final bills. Their arrears should not be absorbed by other ratepayers, she said.

She also said she has noticed stronger corporate commitment to decarbonization and clean energy, even if the pandemic interrupted steady revenues and some technological breakthroughs. She noted the docket her commission opened in October to consider collecting financial disclosures on climate change-related risks.

Barton said going forward, the grid must be “reinforced” so it can support an onslaught of electrification and make it possible for old generation assets to continue to retire and be replaced by renewable sources.

Rich said more utilities have spun off fossil fuel businesses to become pure-play utilities, both for the revenue and the improved public reception.

Social and Environmental Justice

Racial equity and sustainability had a watershed year, despite the coronavirus, panelists agreed. The pandemic and the police killing of George Floyd amplified a social justice focus for virtually all businesses, the energy sector included.

EEI
Fortis CFO Jocelyn Perry | EEI

Fortis CFO Jocelyn Perry said social justice is a relatively new investor expectation. Before this year, Perry said Fortis had focused on gender equality, with a goal of women making up 40% of its board and 33% of its executives.

“But you throw a pandemic and social unrest in this, and we have to broaden more quickly than we thought we had to. … Our customers and our communities are hurting,” she said.

ISS Corporate Solutions Vice President Ben Magarik said an emerging trend is investors voting against or withholding votes on prospective board members. He also said there is increasing pressure on businesses to make disclosures “on a basic level of ethnic or racial diversity” in their workforces.

EEI
Jan Childress, Con Ed | EEI

“There’s an enormous amount of uncertainty in the next few weeks, but there’s also a palpable sense of change among investors and businesses,” Magarik said. “I think society’s pretty clear that we’ve got some hard challenges to tackle.”

Consolidated Edison Director of Investor Relations Jan Childress said his company is tracking metrics on diversity and progress on climate change and tying them to executive compensation. He said coupling climate and cultural progress to salaries is necessary for change and “simply opening our eyes to the truth.”

Data tracking on diversity and sustainability has emerged throughout 2020 for electric utilities, Magarik said.

“I risk a cliché, but what gets measured gets managed,” he said.

MISO Rules out Special MTEP 21 Studies

MISO is sticking with its usual slate of transmission planning studies for next year, opting not to include specially targeted analyses in its annual package.

Project Manager Sandy Boegeman said MISO intends to conduct the usual studies for the 2021 Transmission Expansion Plan (MTEP 21), despite a few specific requests from stakeholders. The grid operator collected ideas for new studies through September. (See MISO Winds down MTEP 20 Planning, Focuses on 2021.)

The Environmental Groups sector requested that MISO conduct two studies examining footprint change if either LG&E and KU or Memphis Light, Gas and Water join the RTO within the next five years.

MTEP 21
| © RTO Insider

“MISO does works directly with entities to understand the potential value of joining MISO, as requested by interested entities. Those requests are independent of the MTEP planning cycle,” Boegeman said during a Planning Advisory Committee teleconference Wednesday.

The Environmental sector had also asked that MISO study the three MTEP 21 futures scenarios using $0/MWh hurdle rates with its neighboring regions. The sector said it wants the RTO to better document the use of hurdle rates in MTEP studies.

American Transmission Co. had asked MISO to study short-circuit ratios and analyze the costs and benefits of designing transmission projects to handle multiple needs instead of a singular need.

Boegeman said these requests did not merit independent studies but could be investigated by tweaking modeling assumptions or methodologies in existing MTEP studies. She said MISO will explore accommodating them and discuss them in upcoming Planning Subcommittee meetings.

PepsiCo ex-CIO Makes 1st Woman Majority on MISO Board

Stakeholders have tapped former PepsiCo Chief Information Officer Jody Davids to serve on MISO’s Board of Directors, creating a first-ever woman majority for the body.

Davids’ appointment means the nine-member board of independent directors tips to a woman majority for the first time since it was established in 1998. Davids joins female Directors Theresa Wise, Barbara Krumsiek, Nancy Lange and Chair Phyllis Currie.

“Even amidst this most challenging year, MISO continues its commitment to diversity and inclusion — this extends to our staff and board. We recognize that we need diverse voices and experiences to move us forward,” MISO CEO John Bear told RTO Insider. “Ms. Davids brings robust information technology knowledge to help us innovate and adapt to the accelerating changes in our industry.”

MISO Board
Jody Davids | Premier

Members also voted to retain incumbent Directors Wise and Robert Lurie, who are both rounding out their first terms and applied for reappointment. Lurie served the final year of former Director Thomas Rainwater’s term, which expires next month. (See MISO Sets Candidate Slate for Board Elections.)

The three-year terms begin Jan. 1.

The election means veteran Director Baljit Dail will not return to the board’s U-shaped table in 2021. Dail served 12 years on the board — three more than technically allowed — through a special waiver that allowed him to stand an extra term to allow the board to retain a person with technology knowhow.

A technology expertise vacuum among board members is no longer a problem with the entry of Davids, who brings more than three decades of experience managing the technology workings of large companies. She has also served as CIO for Agrium, Best Buy and Cardinal Health, and currently sits on the board for Premier, a Charlotte, N.C.-based health care improvement company. Davids holds an MBA from San Jose State University.

“We are pleased to welcome Jody to the board and excited that Bob and Theresa will continue serving. We thank Bal for his service and wish him continued success,” Currie said in a release. “The diversity of thought and experience has never been more important to the MISO board. As we continue to innovate during these challenging times, we are confident that these leaders will help us continue to move forward.”

Bear said Davids’ experience will complement an already “solid team of leaders” on the board.

“I am honored to be selected and delighted to join the MISO board. As a reliable and affordable grid operator, MISO has already achieved much success. I look forward to contributing to this well respected group of experienced professionals,” Davids said.

CIP Compliance: Don’t ‘Boil the Ocean’

The clock is ticking for compliance with NERC’s cybersecurity supply chain risk management standard.

After a three-month delay because of the coronavirus pandemic, CIP-013-1 took effect on Oct. 1, starting the 18-month compliance period for balancing authorities, reliability coordinators, generator owners and operators, transmission owners and operators, and some distribution providers.

The standard, prompted by FERC Order 829 in 2016, requires those registered entities to implement supply chain risk management plans for high- and medium-impact bulk electric system cyber systems.

It also requires them to vet not just third-party suppliers, but also “fourth parties” — the suppliers’ suppliers — to identify any foreign ownership, Dario Lobozzo, Fortress Information Security’s global vice president for supply chain and vulnerability risk, told the Edison Electric Institute’s annual Financial Conference on Tuesday.

CIP Compliance
Dario Lobozzo, Fortress Information Security | Edison Electric Institute

“How do you accomplish that? It requires a pretty broad set of assessments across all of your different vendors that you buy from as well as [individual] products,” Lobozzo said.

But he cautioned entities “not to boil the ocean” to achieve compliance.

“First you want to get a high-level idea of who’s risky, who’s not risky,” Lobozzo said. “From your 1,000- or 2,000-vendor portfolio, which 50 to 200 of them are really CIP-critical vendors and products that you need to move into the next phase?”

“Onboarding” vendors and performing risk assessments on them “can run a tremendous amount of man-hours, or it can be quite simple,” he said. “It really depends on how responsive the vendors are; how precise the [vendor] questionnaire is. And then you’ll need to map all of that and [transmit the results] to your security team, to your procurement team, to your third-party risk management team.”

If an issue is identified and a vendor promises to remediate it in 90 days, “you’ll need to call them back in 90 days and ask for proof of that remediation,” he continued.

In addition to responding to FERC’s directive, CIP-013-1 builds on President Trump’s May 1 Executive Order 13920 on “Securing the U.S. Bulk-Power System,” which prohibits use on the system of equipment that was designed, developed, manufactured or supplied by companies under the control of jurisdiction of U.S. foreign adversaries.

Asset owners with a service territory including military bases or other government facilities may also be subject to Section 889 of the fiscal year 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, which prohibits U.S. government agencies from entering into some contracts involving telecommunications equipment or services from Chinese entities, Lobozzo said.

Identifying foreign ownership, control or influence (FOCI) is “particularly onerous,” Lobozzo said, requiring identification of corporate families that may have acquired vendors and continuously monitoring each vendor for new foreign ownership.

The need for a centralized repository for all that information is what led Fortress to team with American Electric Power in 2019 to create the Asset to Vendor Network (A2V), which Southern Co. joined in June. Hitachi ABB joined in August. (See Hitachi ABB Joins Supply Chain Security Network.)

CIP Compliance
Fortress Information Security created the Asset to Vendor Network with AEP in 2019 to improve CIP compliance and reduce costs. Southern Co. and Hitachi ABB are among the companies that have joined. | Fortress Information Security

By taking a “community approach” to compliance, in which members of the network share their assessments with others, the sponsors say they can improve compliance and reduce compliance costs. Assessments are shared at 50% of the original development cost, with contributors earning royalties that allow them to recover a share of their compliance costs.

“Utilities have a long history of working together to overcome challenges and securing our mutual supply chain through A2V is just the latest example,” Tom Wilson, Southern’s chief information security officer, said in a statement when the company joined the network. “A2V offers the opportunity for companies to collaborate and help share expertise and best practices.”

A2V, which has assessed about 350 vendors and products to date, can complete an assessment within three days, compared with three to six weeks under traditional assessments, Lobozzo said.

Fortress polled 150 vendors and found virtually all of them had some kind of security program in place, “which sounds great on the surface, but then when we dove a little bit deeper, we ended up finding that only about 15 to 30% of them actually had a security program that mapped back to a particular standard or that included common best security practices, like multifactor authentication,” Lobozzo said.

Like prior CIP standards, CIP-013-1 is purposely vague, he said. “They’re really designed to help you as an organization implement some forward-thinking,” he said. It is “not prescriptive as to what you need to do but is prescriptive on what you need to accomplish with your actions.”

“If you read between the lines, it’s clear to me that products are a component that could potentially add a risk to the BES,” he said. “As someone who might be audited, you should be concerned that they might point at a particular product, not just a vendor — and say this particular product is exhibiting vulnerabilities that are now known.”

Western Utilities Eye RTO Membership in SPP

SPP signaled it could be on the verge of further expanding its RTO footprint with an announcement Thursday that several Western utilities are committed to evaluating membership in its regional electricity market.

Basin Electric Power Cooperative, Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, the Municipal Energy Agency of Nebraska (MEAN), Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and the Western Area Power Administration would become the first SPP members to have facilities in the Western Interconnection under the RTO’s Tariff.

WAPA’s membership would include participation of its Upper Great Plains-West (UGP-West) region and Loveland Area Projects, the RTO said.

The utilities, some already members of SPP in the Eastern Interconnection, have all sent letters expressing their interest in placing their Western facilities under the RTO’s Tariff. The letters indicate they will work with SPP to evaluate the terms, costs and benefits of doing so, the grid operator said.

Tri-State staked out a leadership position within the group, devoting part of a Thursday press conference with Colorado Gov. Jared Polis to extoll the benefits of RTO membership. The virtual event was to highlight Tri-State’s electric resource plan, to be filed with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission next month, that will “dramatically” increase its renewable resources and reduce emissions. Under Polis, Colorado has established a goal of 100% renewable energy by 2040.

Tri-State CEO Duane Highley said connecting the West’s solar capacity with the East’s abundant wind capacity — Kansas and Oklahoma both produce more wind energy than they can use — will efficiently facilitate the transfer of additional generating resources across the regions and offer an opportunity for greater solar resource development.

“The next step for us is to help develop an RTO in the West,” Highley said. “In order to [meet our emission-reduction targets], we know we have to coordinate regionally. We want to do everything we can to accelerate this transition to a regional grid. This doesn’t eliminate any of the other options. … We know we have to improve transmission access.”

SPP
SPP’s RTO footprint should it expand into the West | SPP

Noting SPP has seen renewable energy account for nearly 80% of its fuel mix at times, Highley said “we’re going to need that same coordination as we build and integrate renewables into a broad region.”

“Enhancing regional markets will lead to additional efficiencies, reliability and more cost savings,” Polis said, echoing Highley. “[RTOs] are really important to support the integrity of a higher level of renewables across a broader geographic area.”

“We’ve enhanced electric reliability while integrating more renewable generation than many in our industry ever thought possible; modernized the grid; built and operated a dependable and economic market; and equitably allocated the costs and revenues associated with these and other services,” SPP CEO Barbara Sugg said in a statement. “What’s more, we’ve done it all while staying true to our collaborative and member-driven business model, and now we’re excited for the opportunity to bring the value of RTO membership to new customers in the West.”

‘Substantial Benefits’

SPP said a Brattle Group study conducted for the RTO found the move would be mutually beneficial and produce $49 million in annual savings for current and new members. Western utilities would receive $25 million a year in adjusted production cost savings and revenue from off-system sales. Members in the Eastern Interconnection would benefit from $24 million in savings because of the market’s expansion, transmission network and generation fleet.

An SPP spokesman said the report would be shared publicly once it has been reviewed by the membership in December.

“We anticipate the benefits of these entities joining our RTO to exceed those quantified in the study,” SPP’s Derek Wingfield said. The study’s scope was limited only to adjusted production cost savings and the value of off-system sales.

“But there are numerous other, substantial benefits of RTO membership as we’ve demonstrated for years in the Eastern Interconnection,” he said. “We at SPP hope the evaluation of full RTO membership leads to even more chances to help Western stakeholders lower energy costs, integrate more renewable energy and modernize the grid.”

Tri-State, Basin Electric, MEAN and WAPA’s UGP-East joined SPP in 2015, along with the rest of the Integrated System. (See Integrated System to Join SPP Market Oct. 1.)

The utilities and Deseret are also customers of at least one of SPP’s contract-based Western Energy Services, which includes reliability coordination and its Western Energy Imbalance Service real-time market scheduled to launch in February 2021. SPP’s Western RC service will celebrate its one-year anniversary in December.

Tri-State was part of the Mountain West Transmission Group, a coalition of 10 Western utilities that briefly pursued SPP membership in 2017 and 2018. The effort fell apart when Xcel Energy left the group and later committed to join CAISO’s Energy Imbalance Market. (See Xcel Leaving Mountain West; SPP Integration at Risk.)

Tri-State spokesman Mark Stutz said Mountain West’s failure did not end the utility’s “long-term interest in and goal to ultimately participate in a regional transmission organization for our region.”

“Tri-State’s participation in a Western Interconnect RTO is essential to advance our members’ reliability, affordability and clean energy goals,” Stutz said. “While the issues are complex, we remain optimistic that together we are on a path that can capture the full benefits of an organized market in the West.”

SPP’s expansion would add Colorado and Wyoming to the RTO footprint, which would then encompass all or part of 15 states.

NARUC Panel Takes on West’s ‘Surreal Summer’

Rolling blackouts, massive wildfires and extreme heat produced a “surreal summer” in the Western Interconnection that panelists examined during the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners’ annual meeting Wednesday.

The blackouts ordered by CAISO on Aug. 14-15 were not the only extraordinary measures taken to deal with a heat wave that outstripped even normal August highs and sent the temperature in Death Valley to 130 degrees Fahrenheit on Aug. 16.

“This wasn’t just a California event,” said Washington Utilities and Transportation Commissioner Ann Rendahl, who moderated the online panel entitled “Lights Out! Lessons from the West’s Surreal Summer Season.”

NARUC

Washington UTC Commissioner Ann Rendahl moderated a NARUC panel on the West’s ‘surreal summer.’ | NARUC

“The excessive heat across the Western United States resulted in stress for many balancing authorities due to the high air conditioning demand,” Rendahl said. “WECC identified 18 emergency alerts from balancing authorities across the West between Aug. 14 and Aug. 19. A similar event could have occurred in several areas in the West.”

The summer wildfires that blanketed the West in smoke and shut down power in parts of California and Oregon added to the stress on residents and the grid, she said.

Learning from the summer’s events to avoid future blackouts is vital, Rendahl said.

Other panelists were former FERC Commissioner Cheryl LaFleur, a member of the ISO-NE Board of Directors; Ahmad Faruqui, an energy economist and principal with the Brattle Group; David Geier, COO of San Diego Gas & Electric; and Mark Rothleder, COO of CAISO.

Geier spoke about his utility’s lauded efforts to prevent fires in the past decade, such as grid hardening, weather monitoring and public safety power shutoffs (PSPS) to keep utility equipment from sparking blazes.

Rothleder walked through the findings of a preliminary report on the causes of the August blackouts, including day-ahead forecasting failures, untimely exports and limited transmission to import energy from neighboring states. (See CAISO Says Constrained Tx Contributed to Blackouts.)

Faruqui said the summer’s blackouts and PSPS events reminded him unpleasantly of the Western energy crisis and rolling blackouts of 2000/01. This time, his family had battery backup in their home, but hundreds of thousands of customers lost power and air conditioning amid triple-digit temperatures and thick smoke from wildfires.

“We felt we were living at the edge of darkness,” Faruqui said.

Talking with colleagues around the world, he said, he realized “everyone was watching what was happening in California.”

Spur to Regionalization?

LaFleur said that to prevent future outages, California and other Western states pursuing aggressive decarbonization must work harder to ensure they have adequate resources. Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Washington have ambitious clean energy goals, with other states expected to follow suit.

Renewable resources are not the problem, LaFleur said. The extreme weather conditions and fires of August argue for more carbon-free energy to stem climate change, she said.

But states switching to large amounts of wind and solar need dispatchable resources for the times when wind and solar drop offline, she said.

“I think part of the issue in California, systemically, has been not enough dispatchable resources at the right time to balance the solar and wind,” LaFleur said. “California has been very decisive about what resources it doesn’t want, but it’s suffered from a pattern of closing resources before the ones that were supposed to replace them were online. That included losing 10,000 MW of gas in recent years, [while] planning on new resources, including large-scale storage that’s not online yet.”

Studies have shown states can substantially decarbonize the grid while retaining gas plants that are infrequently used but available when needed, she said.

The other big issue is who’s in charge of resource adequacy, she said. RA planning can only work with “clear lines of authority and clear handoffs to make sure that whoever has their hand on the switch running the grid has enough energy when they need it.”

California has a “particularly tangled and complex set of responsibilities for making sure there’s enough resources available to keep the lights on,” LaFleur said. The state Energy Commission forecasts long-term demand; the Public Utilities Commission orders yearly procurement; the ISO runs the grid on the resources it is given, with limited backstop purchasing authority; and the legislature dictates what type of resources are acceptable for load-serving entities to buy, she noted.

The agencies and the ISO need to work together better and with FERC to make sure there are adequate resources going forward, she said.

Western regionalization could also help California and other states ensure there’s sufficient energy while pursuing decarbonization, she said. In past years, California lawmakers have considered efforts to change CAISO’s governance structure to allow it to lead a Western RTO, but without success. Other Western states have also resisted the idea. (See Western RTO Proponents Vow to Keep Trying.)

“I hope that this summer’s events are a spur to think about that one again,” LaFleur said.

ITC Recounts Derecho Response at NERC Conference

ITC Holdings is used to severe weather, with a 16,000-mile transmission network that faces harsh winters in Minnesota and tornadoes in Oklahoma.

Derecho
Darrel Yohnk, ITC Holdings | NERC

But the derecho that hit ITC’s operations in Iowa on Aug. 10 was a new kind of challenge, forcing the company to seek mutual aid for the first time in its nearly two-decade history, Director of Real-Time Operations Darrel Yohnk told NERC’s eighth annual Monitoring and Situational Awareness Technical Conference on Tuesday.

A derecho packs wind speeds equal to a Level 2 hurricane, but the winds blow in straight lines rather than circling. They can occur in a band of rapidly moving thunderstorms when rain-cooled downbursts reach Earth’s surface and spread horizontally.

“A lot of thunderstorms have [downbursts],” Yohnk explained. “What makes a downburst a derecho is the fact that these downbursts can be self-propagating, and they suck more dry air into the storm, making the winds even stronger.”

The National Weather Service defines a derecho as wind gusts of at least 58 mph that cause a swath of damage of at least 240 miles, “which is just huge,” Yohnk said.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the August storm was the most costly thunderstorm disaster in U.S. history, causing four deaths and an estimated $7.5 billion in damages over a 700-mile path from Iowa to Indiana.

Derecho
Time lapse images show the derecho’s path through Iowa, Illinois and Indiana. | National Weather Service

The storm, which carried wind gusts exceeding 100 mph, knocked out more than 1,200 miles of transmission on 144 lines, nearly 20% of ITC’s Midwest network. Almost 800 workers were brought in from other companies to help replace more than 1,000 wooden and steel poles.

The nuclear-fueled Duane Arnold Energy Center near Cedar Rapids, Iowa, lost off-site power for almost a day. The plant got its emergency on-site power running just 11 minutes before losing off-site power, after the loss of four 161-kV, one 115-kV and two 69-kV lines, Yohnk said.

The system “got weak enough that when the [345-kV] Duane Arnold-Hazleton line tripped, the impedance changes on the system were massive. We experienced a power swing event, with the Duane Arnold area swinging against the rest of the [Eastern] Interconnection.”

Derecho
ITC outages resulting from the Aug. 10 derecho | ITC Holdings

During the swing, zone 1 relay settings caused the tripping of a 161-kV and two 69-kV lines which created an electrical island of the nuclear plant and some load out of Hiawatha, Iowa. “A few seconds later, the island breaks up further and the remaining [345-kV] Duane Arnold-Hiawatha line tripped and that isolated the plant by itself,” Yohnk said.

The 161-kV Duane Arnold-Hiawatha line exceeded its system operating limit, with flows 9.5% above the short-term emergency rating for 1.4 minutes. “Of course, we were implementing our operating plan to address that. The plant was ramping down as fast as it could, but this storm activity was impacting us faster than … we could get the unit ramped down,” Yohnk said.

ITC, a unit of Fortis, lost more than 900 MW load, with 500,000 customers — 30% of its Iowa customer base — losing power.

The last customers were energized at midday Aug. 18 after eight days, “which was a phenomenal feat for us,” Yohnk said.

Operating During Pandemic

Yohnk and officials from American Electric Power and Florida Power & Light also shared with the conference their experiences in running their grid operations during the coronavirus pandemic.

ITC’s operations control room (OCR) is located in Novi, Mich., 30 miles from Detroit, which in March was one of three COVID-19 hotspots in the U.S., along with New York City and New Orleans.

Derecho
Workers repair a broken transmission pole following the Aug. 10 derecho in Iowa. | ITC Holdings

ITC had a “fairly generic” pandemic plan, Yohnk said. The plan had been “pretty much theoretical because we really haven’t had opportunities to implement it, fortunately, over the years, unlike our transmission system response plan,” which was activated during the derecho.

ITC removed its operations planning and relay performance engineers from the control room and issued a work-from-home order March 16 while soliciting volunteers for sequestration.

It created three “waves” of staffers to provide day/night coverage for the OCR and two groups for the physical security command center, with one group sequestered on-site and the others sequestered at home. ITC contracted for all three floors of a hotel adjacent to its headquarters to house the workers.

The OCR staff worked 14 consecutive 12-hour day or night shifts before being replaced. Operators tried to avoid using the same consoles in consecutive shifts.

Other staff provided “daily life assistance” to the sequestered workers, such as delivering groceries and medical supplies, and caring for pets.

The company also sanitized its backup control center — a facility 35 miles from its primary control center that is normally used for training — in case it was needed.

Derecho
Phil Hoffer, AEP | NERC

Being sequestered increased the camaraderie of the groups, Yohnk said. “A lot of times in their normal day to day … they get focused on their own work activities and they don’t interact as much on a personal level. The sequestration did give them the opportunity to do that on a much more frequent basis.”

Phil Hoffer, the manager of emergency management system applications at AEP Transmission, said the company did not implement sequestration but that 13,000 of its 17,000 employees began working from home and will probably do so until at least summer 2021.

Hoffer said workers used levity — sharing favorite pandemic songs and goofy high school pictures of themselves — to keep their spirits up. “I think that really helped our employees and supervisors with the stress they were experiencing as a result of all the changes,” he said.

ITC Holdings
Rob Adams, FPL | NERC

“For the most part, we’ve actually been more productive out of the office than we were in the office” because of fewer interruptions, Hoffer said. “Now, my group’s a little different because only one of the people on our team has school-age kids at home. I think your ability to get things done would change dramatically if you had three or four or five school-age kids at home.”

Hoffer said the company uses video of all its attendees for its remote meetings. “I think it’s easier to pay attention if you’re on camera,” he said. “We’re trying to find ways to make it more like we’re in a meeting, where you kind of have to pay attention.”

Rob Adams, FPL’s senior director of grid control systems for power delivery, briefed the conference on the tools the utility deployed to stay connected, including Microsoft Teams to facilitate remote communication and collaboration.

FPL also used Klaxoon, an app that helps managers keep staff engaged during remote meetings by allowing them to answer questions via their cellphones. “They enjoyed the idea of reacting to the presentations,” he said.

MISO Plots Filing to Restrict Mid-queue Fuel Swaps

MISO is down to two options to curb generation developers’ ability to change their proposed projects’ fuel type in the interconnection queue.

Ryan Westphal, MISO manager of resource utilization, said the RTO may use either a combination of a new selection on its interconnection application that temporarily leaves the door open to the fuel change, or a hard deadline on when interconnection customers can make that change.

The issue stems from a MISO Moves to Constrain Mid-queue Fuel Changes.)

Leeward Renewable Energy Development has a wind project currently in the DPP. The developer wants to convert the project to solar energy while also retaining its position in the queue. MISO has expressed concerns that allowing fuel-type changes in the DPP could delay studies and allow developers to submit speculative or ill conceived projects.

Staff may introduce a check box on interconnection requests where the customer could preserve its option to switch fuel types. That would have the RTO studying the interconnection request at 100% dispatch of the most conservative fuel type until the customer can confirm its fuel type.

Speaking at an Interconnection Process Working Group teleconference Tuesday, Westphal said MISO might also create a fixed deadline for interconnection customers to name any fuel changes. He cautioned that proof-of-site control is predicated on fuel type. For instance, a wind farm usually requires more acreage than a solar array or storage facility. He said flexibility in fuel types “would create difficulty in processing site-control documentation.”

Customers in MISO’s interconnection queue must demonstrate 100% site control 90 days before their proposed projects enter the DPP.

MISO Fuel Swaps

| MISO

Westphal said MISO would most likely disallow fuel-type changes after the queue’s second decision point, which occurs roughly 220 days after the DPP begins. He said staff would make an exception for interconnection customers who want to apply to use surplus interconnection service after the second decision point. He said it’s MISO’s preference to not allow fuel type changes while engineers are conducting studies.

The two surviving options are down from four that MISO initially offered.

A previous MISO suggestion to study every interconnection request at a 100% output proved unpopular among stakeholders because it would have created unnecessary transmission upgrades.

“This option is out the door. We’re not even looking at it anymore,” Westphal said.

Stakeholders also said they didn’t want MISO to place a blanket ban on fuel-type changes in the DPP.

Westphal said stakeholders seem most interested in fuel changes that involve adding storage to existing projects.

“It feels like the feedback we’re getting focuses on the option to add storage to an existing interconnection request,” he said. “Because of that, we did try to mold our proposal around that.”

Entergy’s Yarrow Etheredge asked whether MISO considered that a late storage addition to a generation project could be classified as a technological advancement instead of a material modification.

Westphal said too many storage additions to existing project proposals would still burden the study team.

“If we’ve got 10 of these stacked up, do we delay the decision point while we study all of them?” he asked rhetorically.

Etheredge said it’s incumbent on the interconnection customer to have already completed a study to make sure that the technological advancement wouldn’t have an adverse impact on other generation projects in the queue.

Nevertheless, Westphal said that storage additions in the DPP would introduce new dispatch assumptions that have not been studied until that point.

Westphal said MISO would consider some changes to its proposal. He promised he would return in January with a more final proposal that could be filed at FERC as soon as June.

Evergy Disputes NextEra Purchase Offer

Evergy has pushed back against a media report that it recently rebuffed a $15 billion acquisition offer from NextEra Energy, issuing a statement Tuesday that “there is currently no offer or bid from any third party for a potential transaction.”

Reuters on Monday quoted anonymous sources in saying that Evergy, which serves 1.6 million customers in Kansas and Missouri, turned down the offer. (See Report: Evergy Rebuffs NextEra Energy Bid.)

Evergy had explored potential purchases earlier this year but said this summer that it would remain independent. The utility said it will remain focused on a sustainable transformation plan (STP) that guided its decision. (See Evergy Releases Standalone Plan Details.)

“Since announcing the STP, there has been no change in circumstance that alters the basis for this decision,” Evergy said in its statement.

The plan follows a “comprehensive, independent review” that began earlier this year as part of an agreement with activist investor Elliott Management. The STP calls for $8.9 billion of capital investments in facility upgrades, grid modernization technologies and clean energy initiatives through 2024 in the company’s Kansas and Missouri service territory.

Evergy
Evergy’s service territory spreads across Kansas and Missouri. | Evergy

“We remain confident that the STP, which Elliott publicly endorsed when it was announced, is the best risk-adjusted path forward and that all appropriate steps are being and have been taken to maximize shareholder value. We will continue to act accordingly,” the company said.

Kansas and Missouri regulators have both opened dockets on the STP. Evergy said during its quarterly earnings call Nov. 5 that it expects to shortly file a jointly developed procedural schedule with the Kansas Corporation Commission that extends into 2021.

Missouri Public Service Commission staff face a Jan. 29 deadline to file a report on the STP.

“We don’t expect the commissions to take specific action regarding STP in either of those dockets,” Evergy CEO Terry Bassham said during the call. “The main purpose is to gather other information on and review our STP and ensure our continued resolve in meeting previous merger commitments while providing a forum and repository for stakeholder feedback.”

Evergy
Evergy CEO Terry Bassham | Evergy

NextEra, armed with a three-figure stock price in recent years, has been on the hunt for regulated utilities. It has come up short in bids for Hawaiian Electric, Texas’ Oncor and national powerhouse Duke Energy. The company did pick up Gulf Power and Florida City Gas in a $6.4 billion deal in 2018 with Southern Co. and shelled out $660 million for independent transmission company GridLiance in September. (See NextEra Buying GridLiance for $660M.)

The company’s share price opened at $76.56 on Tuesday. NextEra’s common stock went through a four-to-one split in October to make its ownership “more accessible.”

MISO West Risks Becoming ‘Dead Zone,’ Stakeholders Warn

MISO stakeholders sounded alarm bells this week, saying another round of prohibitively expensive system upgrades would render the RTO’s West planning region a “dead zone” for new generation.

MISO West — which includes Minnesota, Iowa, parts of the Dakotas and western Wisconsin — is again facing high system upgrade costs for interconnection hopefuls, this time from SPP studies of generator interconnections, or affected-system studies, along the seams.

SPP’s draft studies of a 2017 cycle of generation projects in MISO West recommend about $500 million of upgrades for 250 MW of projects.

“There are still a lot of coordination issues remaining with SPP,” EDF Renewables’ Anton Ptak said in raising the issue during the Interconnection Process Working Group’s (IPWG) teleconference Tuesday.

Several stakeholders agreed, saying that few projects will proceed in the west at this rate and characterizing the issue as a process failure. They said part of the problem lies in SPP using the stricter network resource interconnection service (NRIS) standard to model all service requests, making upgrades costlier and unnecessary in some cases. MISO uses the more relaxed energy resource interconnection service (ERIS) standard in its affected-system modeling.

“It is a bigger issue. Everyone should be concerned about this,” Savion’s Chad Craven said. “It’s basically going to roadblock everything in the west.”

MISO planning regions | MISO

Craven said the problem should alarm all stakeholders, not just interconnection customers and transmission owners. “The west is essentially going to be a dead zone,” he warned.

“We’re aware of the report and the costs that came from that report. … We understand the difficulties,” said Ryan Westphal, MISO’s manager of resource utilization. Staff said that if stakeholders have an issue with SPP criteria, they should follow the issue in that RTO’s interconnection stakeholder groups.

“MISO should significantly care about this. Without MISO trying to do something about it, it’s going to become a big problem and stalemate things in the west and then in the south,” Craven said. “If nothing else, MISO should be educating stakeholders on why this is happening.”

MISO Senior Corporate Counsel Christopher Supino said there are limits to what the RTO can do about SPP’s study process. He said FERC recently decreed that RTOs are free to choose between NRIS or ERIS modeling standards.

Stakeholders said MISO should make the effort to have meaningful conversations about the problem with them.

“It is extremely concerning. This is going to kill MISO West generation projects,” IPWG Vice Chair Angela Maiko said, adding that the August 2017 batch of projects will probably also be imperiled by high upgrade costs. She said the region runs the risk of never welcoming new generation unless it’s for replacement or surplus interconnection service.

Maiko said MISO may want to consider waiving its project withdrawal fees if SPP’s affected-system studies continue revealing high upgrade costs.

“In my opinion, this is a MISO issue. Even if SPP doesn’t return huge costs for [the] August 2017 [cycle], upgrades are going to cascade. You can see where the problem is going to persist. It’s a fundamentally huge issue,” Craven said, calling the situation “toxic.”

The RTO’s West region has been routinely flagged by stakeholders as a problem area for interconnecting generation. (See MISO West Planning Belies Upgrade Needs, Critics say.)

The Clean Grid Alliance, Solar Energy Industries Association and the American Wind Energy Association said recent upgrade costs have been raising renewable projects’ costs by more than 60% on average in MISO West.

A Siemens system impact study prepared for MISO in March showed that a cluster of 60 western wind generation projects dating back to 2018 and totaling 9 GW would collectively require more than $1 billion in transmission upgrades before they could interconnect.

The estimate prompted MISO to examine ways it could coordinate its interconnection upgrade studies and planning studies under its annual Transmission Expansion Plan. Its hope is to approve more multifunctional transmission projects. (See MISO Processing Heftiest Interconnection Queue Ever.)