FERC last week accepted SPP Tariff revisions implementing recommendations from the RTO’s stakeholders on fast-start resources and ramping products.
The commission accepted SPP’s compliance filing on fast-start pricing but directed a further compliance filing (ER20-644). It also accepted Tariff revisions creating two new ramp capability products for both ramping up and down (ER20-1617).
The proposed Tariff revisions were both included in the Holistic Integrated Tariff Team’s 21 recommendations last year. The HITT reviewed SPP’s models, processes and operations as part of its effort to integrate the expansion of renewable energy, boost reliability, and improve transmission planning and the wholesale market. (See SPP Board Approves HITT’s Recommendations.)
FERC found SPP’s fast-start pricing practices to still be unjust and unreasonable and directed another compliance filing, saying they again do not allow prices to reflect the marginal cost of serving load. The commission last year wrapped up investigations of several RTOs under Federal Power Act Section 206 and ordered SPP to eliminate inflexible operating limits and other rules that it said were preventing prices from reflecting the marginal cost. (See FERC Orders Fast-start Rules for SPP.)
Fast-start units at Oklahoma Gas & Electric’s Mustang Energy Center | OG&E
The commission said two aspects of SPP’s proposal required further revisions. It directed the RTO to provide that, for pricing purposes, fast-start resources’ composite offers be calculated with as-committed commitment costs, regardless of the current offer.
It also ordered SPP to revise its Tariff to provide that a fast-start resource’s commitment costs will be amortized over its economic maximum operating limit and its minimum run time, striking the RTO’s use of the phrase “over an hour.” It said the revisions should provide that the grid operator will calculate the no-load cost added to each breakpoint of a fast-start resource’s energy offer curve by dividing the resource’s no-load offer by its economic maximum operating limit and by the ratio of the number of intervals needed to meet the resource’s minimum run time to the number of intervals in an hour.
FERC rejected the SPP Market Monitoring Unit’s contention that the RTO’s proposal could lead to “unmitigated economic withholding in the dispatch run, potentially resulting in unrelieved congestion and reduced reliability.” The commission found insufficient evidence in the record that the instances of economic withholding contemplated by the MMU would occur frequently enough under SPP’s proposal “to warrant additional mitigation in the dispatch run.”
The commission did agree with the MMU that SPP’s proposal presents a gaming opportunity for fast-start resources because a resource “will have the unique ability to hold its energy offer constant while changing its start-up and no-load offers, and … its composite offer.”
It found that, “on balance, eliminating this potential gaming opportunity outweighs the smaller potential for improved price formation associated with allowing fast-start resources to update their commitment offers after being committed by the market and set price for legitimate reasons in order to recover costs not otherwise recoverable in incremental energy offers.”
FERC said several other issues raised by the MMU and Golden Spread Electric Cooperative were beyond the proceeding’s scope.
SPP has 60 days to reply and must include an effective date that reflects its estimate of when development, testing and software system changes are complete.
Ramp Capability Given Go-ahead
In accepting SPP’s ramp up and down products, FERC ordered the RTO to submit an informational filing notifying the commission of the actual effective date at least 30 days before the Tariff revisions are added to the system software.
Golden Spread protested SPP’s filing, contending that it did not allow offline fast-start resources to participate in the products. The co-op also said the products would reduce the instantaneous load capacity by the amount of cleared ramp capability in a given operating interval. With the reduction, the co-op said, the instantaneous load capacity could be over-procured, leading to price distortion.
FERC agreed with the MMU, which supported SPP’s filing and said that offline resource participation would be impractical under the proposed construct. “As designed, the market clearing engine would be unable to properly evaluate or efficiently dispatch these resources,” the commission said.
Noting the MMU “commits to tracking potential issues with the demand curves going forward and recommending improvements if appropriate,” FERC encouraged SPP “to remain engaged” with the MMU and stakeholders as it gains experience with the ramp products.
Exit Fee Compliance Filing Accepted
The commission also accepted SPP’s compliance filing in a docket related to the elimination of the RTO’s exit fee for non-transmission owners (ER19-2522).
FERC in December rejected a rehearing request from SPP and its load-serving entities. It directed a compliance filing revising the RTO’s Tariff to ensure that a withdrawing non-TO is only exempt from paying a share of SPP’s long-term financial obligations and not all existing obligations associated with the member’s withdrawal. (See FERC Denies Rehearing of SPP Exit Fee Decision.)
Renewable developers like EDF Renewables, behind the Golden Plains Wind Project in Iowa, will now see lower exit costs in SPP. | Business Wire
In fully accepting SPP’s compliance, FERC rejected protests by renewable energy interests, who argued that the revisions to the grid operator’s membership agreement created “ambiguity” as to which costs would be borne by withdrawing non-TOs. EDF Renewables, RWE Renewables Americas and Savion also contended that the agreement’s provisions could be interpreted to say that withdrawing non-TOs are subject to a share of SPP’s long-term financial obligations.
The commission found that the proposed phrase “incurred by SPP directly due to the termination” requires a direct connection between the costs that SPP may recover and the membership’s termination. It said it is “reasonable” for the grid operator to recover costs it incurs directly because of a member’s termination of its membership.
FERC said the requirement that departing members pay a share of SPP’s long-term debts in the event of a partial termination does not apply to non-TO members because they “do not have load, as reflected by SPP’s proposed ‘if applicable’ language.”
The proceeding stems from a 2018 complaint by the American Wind Energy Association and the Advanced Power Alliance, which have long argued against the exit fee. (See Wind Groups Challenge SPP Exit Fee.)
ISO-NEannounced Friday that it had selected a $49 million project by incumbent utilities National Grid and Eversource Energy as the winner of its Boston 2028 transmission solicitation — the cheapest of the 36 proposals it received in response to its first-ever competitive solicitation under FERC Order 1000.
The RTO also issued a response to stakeholders who challenged its selection process, along with a final review of the proposals and an appendix of redacted executive summaries from them. It also posted a memo promising stakeholders discussions this fall on “lessons learned” since it published the request for proposals in December.
The memo from Director of Transmission Planning Brent Oberlin also promised opportunities for the seven bidders whose proposals did not get selected to have one-on-one discussions with the RTO.
“While the process functioned as intended, the ISO observed some areas for improvement, and I am sure that others have suggested improvements as well,” Oberlin said. “As an example, the ISO has noted that due to the handling of corollary upgrades, inclusion of life-cycle costs as part of the Phase One proposals places a burden on the Qualified Transmission Project Sponsors (QTPS), yet has little value during that stage of the process.”
ISO-NE issued the RFP to address transmission violations expected after the retirement of Exelon Mystic Units 8 and 9, whose closing was extended to May 30, 2024, under a two-year, $400 million cost-of-service contract. The project selected by the RTO on Friday has a projected in-service date of Oct. 1, 2023, eight months before the end of the contract.
The Tewksbury, Mass., substation is one of three substations involved in National Grid and Eversource Energy’s $49 million winning proposal to ISO-NE’s Boston 2028 transmission solicitation. | UnitedCivil
The winning project includes the installation of two 11.9-ohm, 345-kV series reactors at the North Cambridge substation (one each on the two 345-kV Woburn-to-North Cambridge cables); a +/-167-MVAR static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) at the 345-kV Tewksbury substation; and a direct transfer trip scheme on the 394 line to eliminate the contingency that causes the 115-kV K-163 line overload.
The selection announcement said it “also serves as notice of the initiation of the Boston 2028 Solutions Study – Mystic Retirement,” in accordance with the reliability planning process under the Tariff.
ISO-NE surprised many stakeholders and drew a legal challenge when it announced June 8 it had selected the National Grid-Eversource proposal as the single finalist in the solicitation, which produced projects ranging as high as $745 million. (See Boston RFP Review Draws Unexpected Crowd.)
In a complaint filed with FERC last month, Exelon accused ISO-NE of violating its Tariff by shortcutting its transmission security review and prematurely culling the bids (EL20-52). (See Exelon Challenges ISO-NE RFP in Bid to Extend Mystic.)
The RTO did not back down under stakeholder questioning, the Exelon complaint or from political pressure from Massachusetts’ two U.S. senators urging the ISO-NE to “prioritize the effects that projects may have on state climate, energy and health goals.”
Point by Point
Even though it said “cost and speed” were the two most important evaluation factors, the RTO in its response to stakeholders asserted that it had reviewed cost competitiveness only after determining whether the proposals provided a viable solution to the identified needs.
ISO-NE’s response focuses largely on rebutting the comments of Anbaric Development Partners, which had proposed two versions of its Mystic Reliability Wind Link, an AC project at $450 million and an HVDC proposal at $750 million.
The RTO said it agreed with two of the developer’s six complaints and removed two preliminary review factors that led to the exclusion of the Anbaric Phase One proposals. “However, with this additional review, the ISO has identified an additional issue with the Anbaric proposals that would also lead to their exclusion from the listing of qualifying Phase One proposals,” it said.
A Siemens static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), like that required in the Boston RFP, supports the power supply for an industrial plant in Frankfurt, Germany. | Siemens
Anbaric said that the RTO’s concerns over the ability of its AC project to provide at least 300 MVAR of continuous dynamic reactive capability via a STATCOM at the point of interconnection was unnecessarily technical in the first phase of a solicitation. ISO-NE insisted that the inclusion of a step-up transformer in a turnkey STATCOM could not be taken for granted.
In disagreeing with Anbaric’s assertion that the RFP process had not been transparent as required by Order 1000, ISO-NE replied that it had “discussed the results of its review of the Phase One proposals and the draft list of qualifying Phase One proposals with the Planning Advisory Committee on June 17, 2020.”
The RTO posted each proposal’s executive summary on its external website on June 16, the day before the PAC meeting.
“We disagree with what the ISO says, both technically, legally and factually, and we think our comments continue to be right,” Theodore Paradise, Anbaric senior vice president for transmission strategy, told RTO Insider. “We think the ISO looked for ways to exclude projects, not with an eye toward finding the more efficient and cost-effective project for the region, but with an eye toward how they could shut Mystic down as fast as possible. But the project selected may not actually allow Mystic to retire and lead to a few more years of the cost-of-service agreement.”
The RTO said it had intended to mask the names of the developers to try to limit any bias during review, but that even with masking it had concerns that some of the responses thwarted “the intent to let each proposal stand on its own merits.”
“Rather than describing the project, some responses are written as an advertisement for the project,” it said. Other responses criticized other possible proposals or referred to specific technologies that “would essentially identify the QTPS,” it said.
Anbaric on June 16 submitted comments to ISO-NE to correct what it perceived to be errors in the review process and expanded on some of those concerns in comments filed July 15 in the Exelon proceeding.
Anbaric said that the project selected relies on the New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC), a transmission line to bring approximately 1,200 MW of Canadian hydropower into Maine that has been the subject of lawsuits and voter challenges that could delay the project past its target 2024 in-service date.
A delay on NECEC could mean that the Mystic units will have to remain in service for several years past 2024 at a cost of $200 million to $300 million per year for the generating station and the LNG terminal needed to fuel it, the developer said.
“When you’re speeding this along, there wasn’t really a discussion, and in the intervening months, things have happened,” Paradise said. “There were new lawsuits filed over the NECEC project, the voter referendum was put on the ballot in Maine. Our comments on that being at risk are not against the project; it’s just pointing out a factual situation.”
Paradise said the Boston RFP “is a tale of irony” in some ways.
“By picking a little project that’s supposed to be fast, you might pick the project that takes longer,” Paradise said. “We think that it’s somewhat likely that the cheapest project in terms of capital costs will not solve the needs to allow for a June 2024 retirement of Mystic, and the costs to the region’s ratepayers may end up being far higher than if a more capable project had been selected.”
Below is a summary of the issues scheduled to be brought to a vote at the PJM Markets and Reliability and Members committee meetings on Thursday. Each item is listed by agenda number, description and projected time of discussion, followed by a summary of the issue and links to prior coverage in RTO Insider.
RTO Insider will be covering the discussions and votes. See next Tuesday’s newsletter for a full report.
Markets and Reliability Committee
Consent Agenda (9:05-9:10)
Members will be asked to endorse the following manual changes and Tariff revisions:
Members will be asked to endorse the proposed solution and corresponding language revisions addressing the short-term solution to resolve issues in five-minute dispatch and pricing. The proposal, endorsed at the June 3 Market Implementation Committee meeting, calls for “work streams”: short-term market changes to address pricing alignment; “enhancements and clarifications” to LMP verification; intermediate operational changes to implement more “regimented” real-time security-constrained economic dispatch (RT SCED) case approvals; and long-term operational changes to investigate changing SCED timing and consider previous dispatch instructions. (See PJM 5-Minute Dispatch Proposal Endorsed.)
Members Committee
1. Five-minute Dispatch and Pricing (11:55-12:25)
See Item 1 in MRC, above.
2. Nominating Committee (12:25-12:35)
The committee will be asked to elect members of the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee.
In 2011, Exelon’s Commonwealth Edison sought to persuade Illinois lawmakers to allow it to make billions in smart grid investments and switch to a formula ratemaking process to allow it to recover its costs more quickly.
But the utility didn’t depend only on its powers of persuasion to get its way. According to a U.S. Justice Department investigation announced Friday, the company also began currying favor with House Speaker Michael Madigan, the chair of the state Democratic Party and the most powerful official in the state.
It began a scheme to pay Madigan’s associates through jobs and internships, and appointed a Madigan ally to its board of directors. (See related story, ComEd to Pay $200 Million in Bribery Scheme.)
In return, the company won Madigan’s support for the 2011 Energy Infrastructure Modernization Act (EIMA) — which approved the formula rate mechanism — and the 2016 Future Energy Jobs Act (FEJA), which authorized subsidies for Exelon’s Clinton and Quad Cities nuclear generators. Exelon’s return on investment? More than $150 million, according to the Department of Justice.
“Today’s filing confirms what we have long suspected and feared: that ComEd and its parent company Exelon’s remarkable public policy success since 2011 was made possible through a corrupt and illegal political influence operation,” Illinois PIRG Director Abe Scarr said in a statement.
Scarr said ComEd “was in crisis” in the decade before the passage of EIMA. “Its distribution system suffered from chronic reliability problems stemming from decades of mismanagement. ComEd was in a financially and politically precarious position, threatening bankruptcy. Former Exelon CEO John Rowe said Speaker Madigan was, through this time, a ‘foe.’ ComEd’s political and financial fortunes then changed dramatically, starting with the passage of EIMA in 2011.”
This account is based on the “statement of facts” attached to ComEd’s deferred prosecution agreement. Although the statement identified those allegedly involved in the bribery scheme by pseudonyms, its descriptions of many of them pointed to specific individuals. (See “Who’s Who” at end of story.)
The Most Powerful Official in Illinois
A protégé of legendary machine pol Richard J. Daley, Madigan has ruled the Illinois House of Representatives as speaker for all but two of the last 37 years, outlasting seven governors and more than 700 state regulators, according to a profile by Illinois Policy, an independent public policy group. The only interruption in the reign of the man known as “the velvet hammer” was when Republicans briefly controlled the House.
ComEd and Exelon hosted an annual fundraiser for House Speaker Michael Madigan and the Democratic Party for at least five years that generated $100,000 or more annually. The 2017 invitation featured Exelon CEO Chris Crane. | Crain’s Chicago Business
Illinois Policy said the House’s parliamentary rules give Madigan more power than any other state legislative leader in the U.S., allowing him to assign committee chairs, block votes on key legislation and decide on the state’s political boundaries.
Madigan also wielded power in his role since 1998 as chairman of the state Democratic Party, a position through which he doled out more than $15 million in campaign contributions to 60 sitting state representatives.
In addition, his law firm specializes in Cook County property tax appeals, handling appeals for more than 4,200 parcels totaling more than $8.6 billion in assessed value from 2011 to 2016, the Chicago Tribune and ProPublica Illinois have reported. “Owners of some of the region’s most valuable real estate can feel pressured to hire Madigan & Getzendanner, which Madigan founded in 1972, in an attempt to lower their property tax burdens,” Illinois Policy said.
Radio station WBEZ reported last month that Illinois Commerce Commission Chair Carrie Zalewski was one of almost three dozen people appointed to state positions by Gov. J.B. Pritzker at Madigan’s request. Zalewski is the daughter-in-law of former Chicago Alderman Michael R. Zalewski, one of the Madigan associates who allegedly received no-work jobs in the bribery scheme.
Pass-through Payments
According to the Justice Department, Madigan’s intermediary with ComEd officials was Michael McClain, who became a ComEd lobbyist after a decade as a state legislator. WBEZ has reported that McClain maintained a “magic lobbyist list” that special interests could hire to ingratiate themselves with the speaker.
Although the Justice Department alleged ComEd’s bribery scheme began in 2011, it quoted McClain telling ComEd officials “that for decades, [Madigan] had named individuals to be ComEd employees, such as meter readers, as part of an ‘old-fashioned patronage system.’”
Retired lobbyist and former legislator Michael McClain (pictured) delivered Speaker Michael Madigan’s request for favors to ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, according to federal investigators. | WBEZ
In or around 2011, McClain and John T. Hooker, ComEd’s executive vice president of legislative and external affairs, developed a plan to direct money to two unnamed Madigan associates (“Associate 1” and “Associate 2”). ComEd agreed to pay them indirectly as subcontractors to Jay Doherty, president of the City Club of Chicago, a public-affairs forum founded in 1903 whose luncheons draw a revolving cast of leaders of Illinois politics, business and media.
McClain explained Associate 1’s importance to Fidel Marquez Jr., the utility’s senior vice president for legislative and external affairs, calling him “one of the top three precinct captains” who also “trains people how to go door to door.”
Doherty’s invoices to ComEd falsely claimed the payments were all in return for his advice on “legislative issues,” “legislative risk management activities” and related matters, “when in fact a portion of the compensation paid … was intended for ultimate payment to [Madigan’s] associates, who in fact did little or no work for ComEd,” the statement of facts said. “Certain senior executives and agents of ComEd were aware of these payments from their inception.”
Doherty’s contract with ComEd was increased to cover payments to the subcontractors. Between 2011 and 2019, indirect payments made to Madigan’s associates who performed little or no work for ComEd totaled about $1.3 million, federal officials said, including payments through Doherty’s company and other third-party vendors. Doherty reportedly earned more than $3 million over a decade as a ComEd lobbyist.
In about May 2018, Madigan, through McClain, asked then-ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore to hire Michael Zalewski, who was retiring from the Chicago City Council at the end of the month.
Pramaggiore, in coordination with Doherty and Marquez, agreed that ComEd would pay Zalewski about $5,000/month as a subcontractor through Doherty’s company.
ComEd’s payments to Speaker Madigan’s associates, approved by ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore (right), were allegedly funneled through third parties, including the firm of ComEd lobbyist Jay Doherty (left).
When she approved the arrangement, Pramaggiore was aware that other Madigan associates also were paid indirectly as subcontractors through Doherty’s company, which she “referred to as the ‘roster,’” DOJ said. Pramaggiore also agreed that Madigan, rather than someone from ComEd, would advise Zalewski of the payment arrangement. (A spokesman for Pramaggiore on Friday declined to comment to the Chicago Tribune on whether she is cooperating with the department but insisted: “Ms. Pramaggiore has done nothing wrong and any inference to the contrary is misguided and false.”)
In a revised contract including the payments to Zalewski, Doherty falsely claimed the additional $5,000/month was necessary because of the company’s “expanded role with [the] Cook County Board president’s office and Cook County commissioners and department heads.”
John T. Hooker, ComEd’s executive vice president of legislative and external affairs, allegedly helped provide two associates of Speaker Madigan with no-work jobs. | Chicago Housing Authority
In February 2019, McClain advised Marquez about how to present information within ComEd concerning the renewal of Doherty’s company’s contract for 2019, warning “I would say to you don’t put anything in writing … [because] all it can do is hurt ya.”
About the same time, McClain had a conversation with Hooker, who had retired from ComEd but had continued to work as an external lobbyist for the company. If asked about the renewal of Doherty’s contract, McClain told Hooker he should explain, “We had to hire these guys because [Madigan] came to us. It’s just that simple.” Hooker agreed, the statement of facts said, adding, “It’s clean for all of us.”
Beginning in 2013, ComEd also set aside a number of internships for students who primarily resided in Madigan’s Chicago ward and were recommended by McClain and others of the speaker’s associates.
Board Post
In 2017, McClain told Pramaggiore that Madigan wanted another associate, Juan Ochoa, former CEO of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, appointed to the ComEd board.
Speaker Madigan pressed ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore to appoint Juan Ochoa, former CEO of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, to the ComEd board in April 2019. | Juan Ochoa via LinkedIn
Internal company opposition to Ochoa’s appointment prompted Pramaggiore to ask McClain in May 2018 if the speaker would be satisfied if she arranged a part-time job that paid as much as the board position: $78,000/year.
McClain told Pramaggiore that Madigan wanted her to “keep pressing” for Ochoa’s appointment. Pramaggiore agreed to do so, later telling McClain, “You take good care of me and so does our friend [Madigan], and I will do the best that I can to, to take care of you.”
In April 2019, Pramaggiore sent McClain a text message that Ochoa’s appointment had been approved. His appointment was announced the following day in a notice with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
“Although ComEd and Exelon conducted due diligence on [Ochoa] and ultimately determined he was qualified for a board position, no one at ComEd or Exelon recruited [Ochoa] to serve as a director, and ComEd did not interview or vet other outside candidates for the vacant board seat,” the statement of facts said.
ComEd also had agreed beginning in 2011 to retain a law firm — described as Law Firm A — with a minimum of 850 hours of attorney work annually. It is unclear if the firm was Madigan’s, but the statement of facts says the hiring was intended “to influence and reward” the speaker.
In 2016, ComEd sought to reduce the hours in the firm’s retainer because there was not enough appropriate legal work to give the firm 850 annual hours.
Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan, the longest-serving speaker in U.S. history, also is head of the state Democratic Party. | Illinois General Assembly
In January 2016, McClain wrote Pramaggiore that a lawyer with the firm (“Lawyer A”) had complained about the utility’s efforts to reduce the contract.
“I am sure you know how valuable [Lawyer A] is to our friend [Madigan],” McClain wrote. “I know the drill and so do you. If you do not get involve [sic] and resolve this issue of 850 hours for his law firm per year, then he will go to our friend [Madigan]. Our friend [Madigan] will call me, and then I will call you. Is this a drill we must go through?”
Pramaggiore apologized: “Sorry. No one informed me. I am on this.” She assigned a ComEd employee who was serving as “project manager” for obtaining legislative approval of FEJA to ensure that the law firm’s contract was renewed.
“The project manager had no oversight authority over ComEd’s legal department and was not otherwise involved in deciding what legal professionals the legal department retained,” according to the statement of facts. “The project manager was assigned the task of ensuring Law Firm A’s contract was renewed because the work provided to Law Firm A was, in part, designed to influence and reward Public Official A in connection with Public Official A’s official duties, including the promotion and passage of FEJA.”
ComEd agreed around June 2016 to renew the firm’s contract but with reduced annual hours.
Utility-backed Legislation Approved
The Justice Department said ComEd’s support of Madigan helped produce two major legislative wins for the utility: FEJA, which included billions in subsidies for two Exelon nuclear generating plants, and EIMA, which authorized ComEd and Ameren Illinois to spend $3.2 billion over 10 years for upgrades, distributed automation and smart meter implementation.
The spending was done under a streamlined formula rate process to reduce regulatory lag and allow quicker inclusion of costs into rates. The rate of return on equity, incentive compensation, rate-case expense and other variables were set in advance. ROEs could be reduced for failing to meet performance targets. Passed by the Illinois House in May 2011 and the Senate in August, EIMA was vetoed by former Gov. Pat Quinn (D) but overridden by the legislature October.
An analysis by Scott Madden management consultants after the first six annual formula rate filings concluded that the utilities had increased their earnings despite below-average ROEs. It said ComEd’s and Ameren’s rate bases had increased by 34% and 24%, respectively, boosting their authorized earnings by 16% and 6% since 2012.
Fidel Marquez Jr. (left), ComEd’s senior vice president for legislative and external affairs until September 2019, and former ComEd CEO Anne Primaggiore (second from right) were both implicated in the bribery investigation. | ComEd
Ameren’s and ComEd’s formula rates have been extended twice beyond their initial sunset in 2017. The current extension ends in 2022.
ComEd is currently running an advertisement claiming the formula rates are responsible for a 60% increase in reliability, $2.1 billion in “customer benefits,” 3,000 jobs and $12 billion in investments in the state economy. The ad is running on the website of Capitol Fax, a newsletter covering state politics, adjacent to the site’s timeline of the federal investigation.
Critics, however, say formula rates have allowed utilities to pass through costs without adequate review and that utilities are effectively guaranteed their authorized rate of return.
ComEd also won Madigan’s support for FEJA, which — in addition to increasing energy efficiency requirements and creating a community solar program — authorized $2.4 billion in zero-emission credits for Exelon’s Clinton and Quad Cities nuclear units.
“Since the passage of FEJA, ComEd has had a continuing interest in advancing legislation in the General Assembly favorable to its interests and opposing legislation that was not consistent with its operational and financial success,” the Justice Department said.
ICC Under Scrutiny
Gov. Pritzker said Friday that Madigan must step down if the allegations against him are true. But a spokesman for the governor told the Chicago Tribune that Pritzker “still has confidence in Carrie Zalewski, who is an accomplished regulator.”
Gov. J.B. Pritzker | Gov. J.B. Pritzker
WBEZ said last month it had obtained emails showing Madigan’s top aide recommended Zalewski for the ICC in December 2018, about four months before the governor named her to a five-year term as chairwoman. She was confirmed by the Senate in May, about two weeks after the FBI raided her father-in-law’s home in the bribery probe, although the raid did not become public until July.
“ComEd’s business model relies on favorable relationships with regulators like the ICC to ensure they get the best possible deal, even if it’s at the expense of ratepayers,” Liz Kantor, a co-coordinator of the Democratize ComEd campaign, told WBEZ. “Clearly a system where regulators are clandestinely appointed by friends of the companies being regulated is not one that is operating in the public interest.”
The ICC announced Friday it had summoned ComEd executives to appear before the commission at its open meeting July 29 in response to the Justice Department allegations.
“Since the beginning of the [Pritzker] administration, the commission has been committed to fostering a culture of transparency, accountability and inclusivity at the agency. This includes holding utility companies accountable for their compliance with ethics reforms required by a law enforcement agency,” the ICC said. “At the open meeting on July 29, the commission will have an opportunity to ask ComEd executives about the ethics reforms that the company says it has implemented.”
ICC spokeswoman Victoria Crawford said the allegations do not involve the chair and should not affect her position.
Gov. J.B. Pritzker appointed nearly three dozen people to state jobs, including Illinois Commerce Commission Chair Carrie Zalewski (#21 on the list), at the request of Speaker Michael Madigan. The names of those who did not get jobs were deleted by the governor’s office. | WBEZ
“There is no conflict of interest, actual or perceived,” Crawford said in a statement. “Chairman Zalewski remains committed to the important work of the Illinois Commerce Commission.”
The ICC pointed to Zalewski’s efforts to increase transparency by broadcasting commission meetings via livestream and providing more detailed explanations about votes.
The commission has been criticized in the past for being too close to ComEd, however.
The Tribune cited the ICC’s “aggressive and unsuccessful battle to shield ComEd from scrutiny” in a wrongful death suit, saying it spent months fighting a court order to turn over documents related to an electrocution that killed cable line worker Robert Zulauf in November 2016. Jordan Zulauf, the victim’s nephew, suffered severe injuries in the accident and had to have both arms amputated. ComEd engineers said the accident was the result of an improperly insulated guy wire.
Stephan Blandin, the attorney for the victim’s widow, told the Tribune on Friday that Zalewski should be removed from the commission.
“The whole purpose of Commonwealth Edison bribing state government is to get favorable rates … and so they don’t face any scrutiny from the ICC,” Blandin said. “What happened to Robert and Jordan is a manifestation of the corruption.”
Zalewski’s predecessor as chair, Brien Sheahan, also was criticized as too close to ComEd.
In April, the ICC announced it would not release a final draft of its “NextGrid: Illinois’ Utility of the Future” study after quietly settling a lawsuit that claimed Sheahan had allowed ComEd and Ameren to exclude some consumer advocates and others from participating in the study. (See ‘NextGrid’ Goes off the Rails.) The report was later published by the University of Illinois.
Who’s Who?
Below is a list of the pseudonyms in the DOJ statement of facts and how the individuals named in the story above were identified.
“Public Official A is the speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives and the longest serving member of the House of Representatives.”
“Individual A served in the Illinois House of Representatives for approximately 10 years beginning in 1972. After Individual A’s service in the Illinois House of Representatives, Individual A served as a lobbyist and/or consultant for ComEd until 2019. During that time, Individual A made known to ComEd that Individual A had a close personal relationship with Public Official A.” Retired lobbyist Michael McClain, whose home was raided by the FBI in mid-May 2019, “fits all of those details,” WBEZ reported.
“CEO-1 was the chief executive officer of ComEd between in and around March 2012 and May 2018. From June 1, 2018, to Oct. 15, 2019, CEO-1 served as a senior executive at Exelon Utilities and had oversight authority over ComEd’s operations.” That is a reference to Anne Pramaggiore, who abruptly retired in October, less than a week after Exelon disclosed it had received a second subpoena in the investigation. The company said investigators were looking for “communications” between Exelon, ComEd and state Sen. Martin Sandoval, a Chicago Democrat whose home and offices had been raided by FBI agents in September. Sandoval’s daughter worked for ComEd as a senior account representative.
“Senior Executive 1 served as ComEd’s senior vice president for legislative and external affairs from in or around March 2012 until in or around September 2019.” WBEZ said this appeared to be a reference to Fidel Marquez Jr., “who held that title as ComEd’s top in-house lobbyist and left the company at that same time.”
“Lobbyist 1 served as ComEd’s executive vice president of legislative and external affairs from in and around 2009 until Lobbyist 1’s retirement in and around 2012. From 2012 to 2019, Lobbyist 1 served as an external lobbyist for ComEd.” ComEd announced in a press release that John T. Hooker was retiring as executive vice president of legislative and external affairs effective Feb. 24, 2012.
“Consultant 1 was the owner of Company 1, which performed consulting services for ComEd until in and around 2019.” WBEZ identified that person as Jay Doherty, who resigned in December after 27 years as president of the City Club of Chicago public affairs group. Doherty, whom WBEZ reported was being investigated for being a “pass through” for ComEd’s payments to politically connected individuals, resigned several months after federal investigators raided City Club’s offices. Doherty had earned more than $3 million over a decade as a ComEd lobbyist.
“Associate 3” was “a political ally of Public Official A who was retiring from the Chicago City Council at the end of” May 2018. Michael R. Zalewski retired from the city council May 31, a year before the end of his term amid speculation he was seeking to avoid a primary fight in his increasingly Hispanic district. Federal agents raided his home in May 2019.
Exelon’s Commonwealth Edison agreed Friday to pay a $200 million fine to settle allegations that it bribed Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan (D) in return for legislation that increased the company’s earnings and bailed out its money-losing nuclear plants.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago filed a one-count information alleging that to influence legislation favorable to the company, ComEd arranged no-work jobs for Madigan associates including former Chicago Alderman Michael R. Zalewski, the father-in-law of Illinois Commerce Commission Chair Carrie Zalewski.
Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan | Illinois General Assembly
ComEd also admitted to appointing a Madigan ally to its board of directors, retaining a law firm favored by the speaker and providing internships to students who resided in the speaker’s Chicago ward. (See related story, How ComEd Got its Way with Ill. Legislature.)
Under the agreement, the bribery charge will be deferred for three years and then dismissed as long as ComEd continues to cooperate with “ongoing investigations of individuals or other entities” involved in the bribery charge.
While Madigan is not named directly in the documents released Friday, the scheme allegedly revolved around what the Deferred Prosecution Agreement called “Public Official A” identified as the “speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives and the longest serving member of the House of Representatives.” Madigan is the longest-serving leader of any state or federal legislature in U.S. history, having held the speaker title for all but two years since 1983.
“ComEd understood that, as speaker of the House of Representatives, Public Official A was able to exercise control over what measures were called for a vote in the House of Representatives and had substantial influence and control over fellow lawmakers concerning legislation, including legislation that affected ComEd,” officials wrote.
Representatives in Madigan’s legislative office confirmed that he had accepted subpoenas Friday in connection with “documents related to possible job recommendations.” Madigan’s office said he will cooperate with the subpoenas.
“The speaker has never helped someone find a job with the expectation that the person would not be asked to perform work by their employer, nor did he ever expect to provide anything to a prospective employer if it should choose to hire a person he recommended,” a spokesperson in Madigan’s office said. “He has never made a legislative decision with improper motives and has engaged in no wrongdoing here. Any claim to the contrary is unfounded.”
The Scheme
According to the charging documents, ComEd admitted that it began its efforts to bribe Madigan around 2011 and continued its efforts until 2019, after the FBI raided the homes and offices of lobbyists and others, including Michael Zalewski. During that span, the Illinois General Assembly considered bills and passed legislation having a “substantial impact on ComEd’s operations and profitability,” including electricity rates for ComEd customers and other legislation worth in excess of $150 million.
The U.S. Justice Department said ComEd made $1.3 million in indirect payments to Madigan’s associates, who performed little or no work for the utility.
Prosecutors said ComEd has provided “substantial cooperation with the federal investigations” and will continue to provide cooperation until the investigation and prosecutions are completed. Exelon officials pointed out that the $200 million fine — more than the $144 million profit ComEd reported for 2019 — will not result in rate increases or charges to its customers.
Company Response
Exelon, ComEd’s parent, said it “fully and substantially cooperated” with the U.S. Attorney’s Office since the beginning of the investigation and has taken internal measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Exelon CEO Christopher Crane said his company is “committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity and ethical behavior,” acknowledging past lobbying practices with public officials “did not live up to that commitment.” Crane said that when Exelon learned about the lobbying practices, it started an internal investigation that identified a “small number of senior ComEd employees and outside contractors” involved in the scheme.
“Since then, we have taken robust action to aggressively identify and address deficiencies, including enhancing our compliance governance and our lobbying policies to prevent this type of conduct,” Crane said. “We apologize for the past conduct that didn’t live up to our own values, and we will ensure this cannot happen again.”
Exelon said it implemented four new policies governing interacting with public officials; vetting and monitoring of lobbyists and political consultants; employment and vendor referrals; and requests from public officials.
The grand jury probe leading to the bribery charge brought about the retirement of Exelon Utilities CEO Anne Pramaggiore on Oct. 15, less than a week after the company disclosed it had received a subpoena seeking communications between Exelon and state Sen. Martin Sandoval, a Chicago Democrat whose home and offices were raided by FBI agents in September. Sandoval’s daughter was hired by ComEd during Pramaggiore’s tenure. (See Exelon Pledges Reforms amid Grand Jury Probe.)
The breadth of ComEd’s involvement with Madigan, however, raises questions about whether all those who were aware of the company’s payoffs have left the company’s payroll.
Crain’s Chicago Businessreported last December that ComEd and Exelon hosted an annual fundraiser for Madigan and the Democratic Party for at least five years that generated $100,000 or more annually. The 2017 invitation featured Crane prominently.
Reactions to the Charges
News of the allegations prompted harsh criticism on both sides of the aisle.
During an unrelated press conference, Gov. JB Pritzker (D), who took office in 2019, said the allegations were “very upsetting” and that Madigan “must resign” if they are true.
“People in public service need to live up to the integrity of the job they were asked to do,” Pritzker said. Madigan “needs to be forthcoming right away with answers.”
However, a spokesman for the governor told the Chicago Tribune that Pritzker “still has confidence in Carrie Zalewski, who is an accomplished regulator.”
Tim Schneider, chairman of the Illinois Republican Party, later called out the governor as well as Madigan in a statement, pointing to an investigation into $331,000 in alleged tax breaks Pritzker received in a remodeling project of a mansion he owns. “The people of Illinois now live in a state where both the speaker of the House and the governor are under criminal investigation,” Schneider said. “Even for a state with a history of corruption, this is unprecedented. Crimes of bribery and tax fraud cannot be tolerated from our elected officials.”
Tyson Slocum, energy program director of Public Citizen, a D.C.-based think tank, criticized the $200 million settlement for ComEd, calling it a “paltry sum.”
“The company’s successful lobbying blitz to pass controversial Illinois legislation in 2016 provided massive ratepayer-funded bailouts of its inefficient nuclear power plants — and forced ratepayers to fork over $235 million a year to Exelon for 10 years starting in 2017,” Slocum said. “This settlement is pennies on the dollar for what Exelon will earn off the bailouts.”
PJM, CAISO and SPP took a step closer Thursday to the full implementation of Order 841 with FERC’s partial acceptance of their Tariff revisions.
Order 841, issued in February 2018, directed RTOs and ISOs to remove barriers to the participation of energy storage resources (ESRs) in their wholesale electric markets.
The commission accepted PJM’s compliance filing — its third in response to the order — subject to yet another revision, calling for the Tariff to state that the RTO will not charge a distribution-connected ESR for charging energy if the distributor is unwilling or unable to net out any retail energy purchases associated with the ESR’s wholesale charging activities from the host customer’s retail bill (ER19-469).
FERC said PJM did not follow the proposed language in its second order on compliance, instead filing Tariff language specifying that the provision only applies to an ESR that is “co-located with end-use load.”
“We are concerned that this language could exclude a distribution-connected energy storage resource that is not directly on the site of end-use load but nonetheless receives a retail bill because it is located behind a distribution utility meter,” the commission wrote.
The commission directed PJM to submit a further compliance filing to either clarify how its proposed Tariff provisions prevent all distribution connected ESRs from paying twice for the same charging energy or propose Tariff revisions to ensure the outcome. The RTO has 90 days to make the filing.
FERC did accept PJM’s proposal to modify its participation model to more appropriately account for an ESR’s state of charge, maximum state of charge and minimum state of charge by using bidding parameters incorporated into its day-ahead and real-time market clearing engines. It also accepted the RTO’s proposal to add Tariff definitions of bidding parameters that include: minimum and maximum charge limit; minimum and maximum discharge limit; and charge and discharge ramp rate.
The provisions in the compliance filing are effective retroactively to Dec. 3, 2019, with a limited number of revisions to become effective March 31, 2024, subject to the further compliance filing.
CAISO Compliance
CAISO also edged closer to full acceptance of its energy storage market participation rules when FERC approved nearly all the provisions included in the ISO’s second Order 841 compliance filing (ER19-468).
The commission approved CAISO’s energy storage participation model last November (becoming effective Dec. 3, 2019) but directed the ISO to:
revise its Tariff to include a “basic description” of its metering methodology and accounting practices for storage resources;
explain how the metering and accounting practices allow storage resources to participate in both wholesale and retail markets, or revise its Tariff to allow storage resources that provide retail services to also participate in CAISO’s wholesale market; and
revise its Tariff to explain that if an ESR’s host utility is unwilling or unable to net out any energy purchases associated with the resource’s wholesale charging activities from the resource’s retail bill, then CAISO would be prevented from charging wholesale rates for charging energy for which the resource is already paying retail rates.
FERC on Thursday approved of CAISO’s proposal to address the first shortcoming by creating a new Tariff section, 10.1.3.4, which describes the metering and accounting for storage resources, including provisions meant to ensure that resources avoid double-billing for retail and wholesale participation.
The section also contains an explanation that resources can elect to become either: “metered entities,” which pay higher upfront costs for a more complex certification process that helps resources avoid ongoing costs related to meter data validation and avoid certain penalties because they are being instantaneously metered by CAISO; or “scheduling coordinator metered entities,” which must comply with several initial and ongoing requirements to meet Tariff requirements but can avoid some upfront costs and are allowed to propose “unique, complex metering configurations” for ISO approval.
Invenergy’s Grand Ridge Battery Storage Facility in Illinois | BYD
The commission also accepted related Tariff provisions giving both types of metered entities flexibility in how they configure their metering systems to avoid “commingling” of retail and wholesale meter data.
“CAISO states that electric storage resources — especially those that may participate in retail and wholesale markets simultaneously — have highly variable metering needs, local regulatory requirements and configurations,” FERC wrote. “CAISO states that by including simple, flexible Tariff provisions, CAISO will avoid a one-size-fits-few approach and instead be able to review each storage resource’s proposal to ensure CAISO receives settlement quality meter data for wholesale charges only.”
The only sticking point in the compliance filing: CAISO’s solution for resources unable to net out wholesale energy purchases from their retail bills. While FERC approved a proposed requirement that a host utility distribution company or retail utility verify in writing to the ISO when it is unable or unwilling to net out from its retail billing any wholesale energy purchases, the commission pointed out that the provision applies only to a “non-generating resource” (NGR), a resource type created by CAISO to accommodate market participation by resources that can both inject or withdraw energy from the grid.
“We note that this provision only applies to NGRs, and therefore does not apply to all electric storage resources, as required by the commission’s directive in the first compliance order,” FERC wrote, directing CAISO to submit a third compliance filing that clarifies the rule will apply to storage resources participating in the market as other resource types.
SPP Compliance
FERC accepted and rejected in part SPP’s second attempt to comply with Order 841, requiring yet another compliance filing within 90 days (ER19-460).
The commission found that the RTO’s proposed Tariff revisions partially complied with the order’s requirements on registering ESRs. It said it was “concerned” that SPP’s provisions requiring ESRs certify that their wholesale market participation “is not precluded under the laws or regulations of the relevant electric retail regulatory authority” could be interpreted “to include an opt-out that the commission declined to provide, which would be inconsistent with Order Nos. 841 and 841-A.”
Other than that, FERC said, SPP’s revisions describing ESRs’ metering methodology and accounting practices “provide additional guidance to market participants and appropriately reference additional documents that provide implementation details.”
SPP made its first compliance filing in December 2018. FERC last October accepted and rejected it in part, ordering a second compliance filing. (See FERC Partially OKs PJM, SPP Order 841 Filings.)
The grid operator in December asked to delay the Tariff revisions’ effective date, citing issues with software implementation and its settlement management system. The commission set an effective date of Aug. 5, 2021. It rejected a subsequent SPP request to set another date.
CAISO moved a step closer to meeting Order 845 requirements last week when FERC accepted most Tariff revisions included in a second compliance filing after the ISO’s first attempt met a raft of rejections in February (ER19-1950).
Two inland West utilities, Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) and Deseret Generation & Transmission Cooperative, also nearly reached compliance with the order, which FERC issued in 2018 to amend its pro forma large generator interconnection agreement and large generator interconnection procedures to increase the transparency and speed of the interconnection process.
RTOs, ISOs and utilities have struggled to fully comply with the order, with most facing FERC directives to submit second — and even third — compliance filings. (See CAISO, NYISO, Companies Win Partial OK on Order 845.)
The commission on Thursday approved the majority of CAISO’s proposed revisions in the second round, including those dealing with:
transparency around study models and assumptions, with CAISO planning to maintain an Open Access Same-Time Information System link to a secured section of its website containing interconnection base case data;
interconnection study deadlines, with CAISO incorporating FERC’s pro forma language into its Tariff to describe how the ISO will provide summary statistics on the processing of interconnection studies;
provisional interconnection service, with the ISO removing language restricting the use of limited operation studies to instances when a transmission owner is unable to complete facilities by the interconnection customer’s commercial operation date; and
surplus interconnection service, with FERC agreeing to CAISO’s plan to rely on existing Tariff provisions to memorialize the transfer of such service.
But FERC only partially accepted a proposal outlining the ISO’s planned response to an interconnection customer’s request to incorporate a technological advancement into a project after that project has entered the queue, which could trigger the need for additional studies ahead of a final interconnection study.
While CAISO’s second compliance filing offered no revisions to the plan FERC originally rejected in February, the filing did provide additional details explaining the ISO’s approach. CAISO explained that its “material modification assessment process” enables interconnection customers to make modifications to their projects without losing their place in the queue. Additionally, the ISO offers a “permissible technological advancement process” as a faster, cheaper alternative for “simple” modifications.
“Rather than create a limited, rigid list of permissible technological advancements, CAISO created a list of known permissible advancements and allowed for any other advancements that meet CAISO’s definition of permissible technological advancement,” FERC noted.
Under the proposed Tariff provision, customers seeking to make technological changes to their projects would need to advance CAISO a flat $2,500 fee to cover the costs of studying the impacts of the changes. The commission accepted the fee but found that the ISO had not complied with Order 845 requirements and the compliance directives in the February 2020 order “with respect to the requirement that CAISO provide a more detailed explanation of the studies that CAISO will conduct to determine whether the technological advancement request will result in a material modification and determine whether or not a technological advancement is a material modification within 30 calendar days of receipt of the initial request.”
FERC also found that the CAISO Tariff’s use of the terms “conditionally assigned network upgrades” and “precursor network upgrades” — instead of the term “contingent facilities” — does not comply with Order 845 and the February compliance directive with respect to interconnection facilities.
“While CAISO states that it will apply the terms ‘conditionally assigned network upgrades’ and ‘precursor network upgrades’ to all facilities identified in the interconnection customer’s study reports, it is unclear how these terms, which by their own names and definitions relate to network upgrades, address interconnection facilities that may also be contingent facilities pursuant to the pro forma LGIP definition of ‘contingent facilities,’” FERC wrote.
The commission directed the ISO to submit a further compliance filing within 120 days addressing the technological changes issue and how it will identify interconnection facilities that are contingent facilities “in light of the fact that the two terms with which CAISO proposes to replace the term ‘contingent facilities’ do not by definition include interconnection facilities.”
Utilities Near Compliance
The commission on Thursday accepted nearly every provision of PSCo’s Order 845 compliance filing but ordered the utility to revise its tariff to explicitly state that it will take no more than 30 days to determine whether an interconnection’s technological change request actually qualifies as a “material modification” requiring additional study (ER19-1864).
Utah-based Deseret similarly came within a hair’s breadth of compliance, with the commission ordering the co-op to specify the deposit that interconnection customers must provide to cover additional studies when submitting a technological change request (ER19-902).
FERC clarified some aspects of its orders approving ISO-NE’s cost-of-service contract with Exelon’s Mystic Generating Station and ordered the company to make additional compliance filings in three rulings Thursday.
The RTO signed the two-year, $400 million contract to preserve the region’s reliability after Exelon announced plans to shutter the plant when its existing capacity supply obligations expire in 2022.
The commission on Thursday granted limited clarifications on its July 2018 (ER18-1639-001) and December 2018 orders (ER18-1639-002) approving ISO-NE’s agreement for Mystic Units 8 and 9, including payments to the company’s Everett LNG facility. (See FERC Approves Mystic Cost-of-Service Agreement.)
Supporting the rulings were Chairman Neil Chatterjee and Commissioners Bernard McNamee and James Danly. Commissioner Richard Glick, who had opposed the 2018 orders, dissented.
In ruling on rehearing requests on the July order, the commission granted the Massachusetts attorney general’s request for clarification that Mystic must prove its capital expenditures are just and reasonable to recover their costs.
Authority over LNG Terminal Challenged
But the commission majority disagreed with contentions by the AG and New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission that FERC had asserted jurisdiction over Exelon’s Everett LNG facility — the sole source of Mystic’s fuel — by approving the power plant’s fuel costs.
“Review and approval of the fuel supply charge … can include consideration of whether it is just and reasonable for Mystic to include in its rates charges traceable to specific costs that Everett incurred and that are included in the fuel supply charge. The commission’s findings may affect or have implications for Everett but do not constitute an assertion of jurisdiction over (i.e., regulation of) Everett or Everett’s incurrence of costs,” the commissioners said. “We thus disagree with the New Hampshire PUC that the commission is proposing to regulate the rates of an LNG import terminal.”
Exelon’s Mystic Generating Station, on the Mystic River in Everett, Mass. A wind turbine owned by the local water authority to power a pumping station is on the right.
In his dissent, Glick said, “I do not believe that the commission can or should use its authority over wholesale sales of electricity to bail out a liquefied natural gas import facility. …
“Because Everett does not rely on the interstate pipeline grid to acquire natural gas (instead receiving it via ship), it can provide another source of natural gas for the region when the pipeline system becomes constrained, as may happen during stretches of cold weather when heating needs cause demand for natural gas to surge. But Everett apparently depends on its sales to Mystic to remain financially solvent, and letting Mystic retire could indirectly lead Everett to close,” Glick wrote. “It is Everett, not Mystic, that, in fact, provides the purported fuel security benefit underlying this proceeding. Accordingly, the commission has chosen to use its authority under the [Federal Power Act] to retain Mystic in order to keep Everett from going under.”
December 2018 Order
In ruling on challenges to the December 2018 order, the commission rejected concerns regarding anticompetitive behavior as beyond the scope of the proceeding.
“For similar reasons, we find that the issues raised on rehearing about market manipulation and the general functioning of natural gas and electric markets also are beyond the scope of this proceeding. Thus, the commission did not err in failing to take into account potential market manipulation as it relates to the Mystic agreement because sufficient protections exist to protect against this behavior. We reiterate that the commission will continue to monitor, as always, the New England natural gas and electricity markets during the term of the Mystic agreement for anticompetitive behavior and market manipulation.”
The commission rejected Mystic’s claim that a true-up mechanism was unnecessary to protect consumers. “We continue to find that the true-up requirement is not administratively inefficient; rather, it is appropriately transparent to render the rate just and reasonable,” FERC said.
But the commission granted Mystic’s request for clarification regarding the timing of capital expenditure projects.
Clawback Mechanism
In a third order, the commission accepted in part Mystic’s compliance filing on true-up and clawback mechanisms but required the company to make an additional filing regarding the accounting for its purchase price of the plant (ER18-1639-003). The clawback mechanism would require Mystic to refund capital expenditures if the generator chooses to continue participating in ISO-NE’s markets after the termination of the cost-of-service contract.
In a bid to extend Mystic’s contract for an additional year, Exelon last month accused ISO-NE of violating its Tariff by prematurely culling bids received in response to its Boston competitive transmission solicitation. (See Exelon Challenges ISO-NE RFP in Bid to Extend Mystic.)
The Organization of MISO States continues to signal its grid operator that regulators are ready for dynamic transmission line ratings in the footprint.
OMS invited an ERCOT executive to explain the benefits of dynamic line ratings (DLRs) at its board of directors meeting Thursday.
ERCOT Senior Director of System Planning Warren Lasher said DLRs provide value, “especially in off-peak conditions like spring and fall, when you’re likely to see more wind on the system.”
The Texas grid operator now uses dynamic ratings in 60 to 70% of its circuits, Lasher said. He said it uses data lookup tables from transmission owners coupled with local weather data to assign ratings.
“We’ve seen a significant amount of benefits, in two ways really. … We’ve seen reduced congestion, and we’re able to get more lost cost power to our customers. But we also see in our reliability studies that we can schedule more maintenance outages in the spring and fall,” Lasher told regulators.
OMS has recently been in discussions with MISO Independent Market Monitor David Patton about implementing DLRs. OMS President and Minnesota Public Utilities Commissioner Matt Schuerger said in June that the RTO’s ratings are overly conservative, inconsistent and not transparently formed.
MISO TOs have also been meeting with Monitor staff to discuss dynamic and ambient temperature-adjusted line ratings, Otter Tail Power’s Stacie Hebert said last month.
During this month’s Market Subcommittee meeting, Patton said the annual value of MISO’s real-time congestion routinely exceeds $1 billion, due in part to “very conservative, static ratings by most transmission operators.”
“I think more are becoming aware of this problem,” Patton said, citing last year’s FERC technical conference and OMS’ interest.
Patton said a “broad adoption” of ambient-adjusted ratings could have reduced congestion costs by as much as $150 million in 2018 and 2019. Over those two same years, had TOs just provided short-term emergency ratings, an additional $114 million could have been saved in congestion, he said.
However, Patton said he’s had little luck so far trying to convince individual TOs to use the technology.
OMS Executive Director Marcus Hawkins said the group will present a position statement in August on the subject. He said he believes MISO’s systems are advanced enough to accommodate the technology.
FERC on Thursday approved MISO’s request for a one-time waiver giving market participants the opportunity to replace load-modifying resources affected by the coronavirus pandemic.
The waiver will permit market participants that manage an affected LMR to register new resources with MISO to fulfill capacity obligations. FERC said the temporary measure will help ensure reliability during the pandemic (ER20-2156).
“We find that the requested waiver addresses a concrete problem because, absent this waiver, market participants whose accredited LMRs will otherwise be unable to meet their performance requirements for the 2020/21 auction,” FERC said.
MISO requested the waiver in late June, saying that some LMRs that cleared the 2020/21 Planning Resource Auction may not be able to perform because of closures of businesses that would otherwise be used to control load. (See MISO Drafts COVID-19 Waiver for LMRs.) The waiver is considered effective July 15, and market participants have 90 days to register replacement LMRs.
FERC said MISO’s plan is reasonable and doesn’t carry unintended consequences for third parties. No parties protested the RTO’s request.
“The waiver will provide certain market participants affected by the COVID-19 pandemic additional flexibility to satisfy their LMR performance requirements; market participants who have registered planning resources that are not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic will not be impacted by this waiver,” the commission said.
This is MISO’s second filing for a waiver of Tariff requirements as the pandemic plays out. Some interconnection queue customers now have longer to secure proof-of-land use for their proposed generation projects. FERC granted MISO’s request for a 60-day extension of its June 25 site control demonstration deadline in May, when the pandemic locked up government offices and held up construction plans (ER20-1794).