Search
December 7, 2025

Dominion Takes Hit on Warm Weather, Looks to Questar

By Ted Caddell

Dominion Resources blamed December’s “extremely mild weather” for a drop in its fourth-quarter earnings, reporting earnings of $416 million ($0.70/share) compared to last year’s $490 million ($0.84/share) for the same period, a decline of about 15%. The weather reduced earnings by about 8 cents/share, the company said.

dominion“While we have discussed our sensitivity to weather in prior calls, never [has weather had] the kind of impact that we saw in December,” said CFO Mark F. McGettrick in a conference call with analysts.

Dominion projected earnings per share for the year of $3.50 to $3.85/share, but the company came in at $3.20/share on revenue of $1.9 billion. This was compared to earnings of $1.3 billion, or $2.24/share, for 2014.

The company noted that it is nearly done building the 1,358-MW natural gas combined cycle plant in Brunswick County, Va., and that it has obtained nearly all necessary approvals to build a 1,588-MW combined cycle plant in Greensville County, Va.

Most of the call was taken up, though, with news that it is buying the Utah-based natural gas distributor Questar for $4.4 billion in cash in a deal aimed at expanding its gas business into the West.

Dominion said it expects to complete the acquisition by the end of the year. The company also said it would be assuming Questar’s approximately $1.31 billion in long- and short-term debt.

Like Duke Energy, which announced in October it would purchase Piedmont Natural Gas, Dominion expects the value of natural gas to increase as more and more states switch to the fuel for electric generation in order to meet state and federal emissions mandates.

CEO Thomas Farrell II said the Questar acquisition “provides enhanced geographic diversity to Dominion’s natural gas operations.”

“While our Dominion transmission system is known as the Hub of the Mid-Atlantic, the Questar system is called the Hub of the Rockies, and a principal source of gas supply to the Western states. We believe the value of the system will increase over time,” Farrell said. “As Utah and the surrounding Western states seek to comply with the requirements of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan … compliance is highly likely to result in an increased reliance on low-emission, gas-fired generation.”

It is Dominion’s latest big natural gas play. The company is one of the majority owners of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project, a $5 billion, 550-mile pipeline that would bring natural gas from the shale fields in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio to markets and terminals in Virginia and North Carolina. Farrell said construction is expected to start by the end of the year.

Dominion also has invested $3.8 billion to convert its LNG import terminal at Cove Point, Md., on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay, into an export facility.

NYPSC Denies Entergy Arbiter in Indian Point Investigation

The New York Public Service Commission on Tuesday denied Entergy’s request for an administrative law judge to handle the company’s objections to the state’s investigation of the Indian Point nuclear power plant (15-02730).

entergyGov. Andrew Cuomo ordered the PSC to investigate plant operations and finances after two unplanned outages in December. Entergy has called the investigation “political” and objected to turning over documents that it says are outside the scope of any state investigation. (See Entergy Disputes Investigation of Indian Point, Calls it Political.)

“The appointment of an ALJ is neither appropriate nor needed. This matter is a special investigation ‘directed by the governor and performed by PSC staff, into specific problems or events at a facility,’ with which Entergy is required to cooperate,” the commission said. An ALJ acting as a referee “would not expedite resolution of disputes” as contested rulings would lead to more administrative appeals, it said.

The NYPSC has made five requests for “batches” of documents related to plant operations from Dec. 28 to Jan. 22. Cuomo wants the initial findings of the investigation reported by Feb. 15.

Entergy said it has complied to the vast majority of the document requests. PSC staff so far has not countered its objections, according to Michael Twomey, Entergy vice president of external affairs.

“We have provided over 300,000 pages of documents, but there are some, for example, related to nuclear safety, that are solely under Nuclear Regulatory Commission jurisdiction,” Twomey said.

State officials have also asked for financial documents from the plant, which the company has also contested.

— William Opalka

Exelon Reiterates March 4 Deadline on PHI Deal

By Suzanne Herel

Exelon’s primary goal for 2016 is completing the acquisition of Pepco Holdings Inc., but the company has contingency plans in place if the D.C. Public Service Commission doesn’t rule by March 4, CEO Christopher Crane told analysts Wednesday.

exelon phi mergerSpeaking during an earnings call, Crane said the company will abandon the merger and begin buying back the 57.5 million shares it issued for the $6.8 billion deal if regulators don’t act promptly.

“That’s our only commitment, to try this until March 4,” Crane said. “If we can’t get it by March 4, then we have to fold up and then start to execute on the debt reduction and the buyback of the equity issued.”

While the PSC indicated in its Oct. 28 order  that it expected to rule by March 4, a PSC spokeswoman said the commission is not obligated to act by then (case 1119).

“There is no requirement, statutory or otherwise, that obligates the commission to issue a decision within a certain number of days from the date the record closes in a commission case,” said spokeswoman Kellie Didigu. “It is a commission policy to issues a decision within 90 days on major cases, such as rate cases and the current merger proceeding. However, if necessary, the commission can take more time.”

The commission closed the record Dec. 23, making the 90-day mark late March. The commission will post a notice and an agenda 48 hours before an open meeting at which the commissioners will announce their decision, Didigu said.

Valuing Nuclear

Crane said another focus of 2016 will be advocating for the company’s nuclear fleet to be “properly valued for their clean, safe and reliable attributes.”

To that end, the company is supporting FERC-ordered reforms to MISO’s capacity market, especially regarding Zone 4. There, April’s capacity auction saw prices clearing at $150/MW-day, up to 40 times more than elsewhere in the RTO. (See MISO Files Changes to Capacity Rules; Seeks Adjustment on Import Limit.)

Exelon is also continuing to push Illinois legislators to adopt a plan to help shore up the finances of its Byron, Quad Cities and Clinton plants. (See What’s Next for Exelon’s Nukes, AEP Merchant Fleet?)

“We were successful and PJM was successful in the capacity market redesign. That gave some upside to the fleet in NiHub [Northern Indiana],” Crane said. “It greatly helped Byron and added help to Quad Cities.”

Still, he said, Quad Cities is struggling, and Clinton is in the red, he said.

As for the MISO reforms, Crane said, “We would like the design to be more like the PJM capacity market design.” But, he said, “That in itself will not save Clinton.”

In New York, Exelon’s Nine Mile Point and Ginna plants might be helped by a zero-emission credit program being developed at the direction of Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

“We still have quite a ways to go, but as a threshold political matter, having a governor of the prominence of Gov. Cuomo step forward and propose to compensate nuclear fairly to keep it in business is important,” said Joseph Dominguez, executive vice president for government and regulatory affairs. “If we get the details right, I would go so far as to say it’s kind of a watershed event for the industry.” (See New York Would Require Nuclear Power Mandate, Subsidy.)

Added Crane: “We’ve got a very supportive administration that recognizes the clean benefits of nuclear, and that’s really appreciated.”

Crane also announced during the earnings call that Exelon will be increasing its dividend by 2.5% each year for the next three years beginning in June, regardless of whether the PHI deal goes through.

Earnings

Exelon reported fourth-quarter earnings of $309 million ($0.33/share), compared with $18 million ($0.02/share) for the same quarter in 2014. Its revenue for the quarter was $6.7 billion, compared with $7.26 billion in 2014.

“Despite a challenging year for the sector, strong operating performance at both our utilities and our generation business enabled us to deliver strong earnings,” Crane said.

Exelon said fourth-quarter earnings were impacted by warm weather in the ComEd and PECO zones, increased nuclear outages, higher depreciation and amortization expenses for its generation business and the cost of funding the PHI transaction.

That was partially offset by higher earnings at Commonwealth Edison, and lower uncollectible accounts at PECO and Baltimore Gas and Electric.

Crane said the utilities experienced a record earning year. Net income for the full year was $2.27 billion ($2.54/share), compared with $1.62 billion ($1.88/share) for 2014. CFO Jack Thayer said the company is poised to invest $3.95 billion in capital across three utilities and an additional $1.38 billion at PHI.

Clark Calls for New Look at Order 745

By Rich Heidorn Jr.

FERC Commissioner Tony Clark said last week that the Supreme Court’s ruling upholding FERC’s jurisdiction over wholesale demand response frees the commission to take another look at Order 745’s requirement that RTOs pay DR providers LMPs equal to generation.

“With the disposition of these matters, I would encourage the commission to turn its attention towards a thorough assessment of the underpinnings of a compensation regime that continues to be widely panned by market experts,” he said in a statement.

“That this case has garnered so much attention says much about how financially lucrative the current mechanism is to one particular type of market participant. Yet the commission’s job is not to support a particular technology, resource class or business model based on its subjective preferences; it is to dispassionately create mechanisms that find economically proper prices.”

The Supreme Court rejected the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling that FERC overstepped its jurisdiction and that the pricing regime required by Order 745 was “arbitrary and capricious.” (See related story, Legal Challenge Behind it, DR Seeks to Overcome Behavioral Resistance, Varying State Rules.)

Critics, including former Commissioner Philip Moeller, who dissented on the 2011 order, contend DR should be paid a price of LMP minus G, where “G” stands for the retail price of electricity.

The majority said full LMPs was appropriate because rates should reflect the service provided rather than the provider’s cost. It said its reasoning was consistent with the single-price clearing method used by RTOs: nuclear, coal, gas and wind generators are all paid LMPs regardless of their fuel costs or tax advantages.

The commission also said it would be difficult to establish “G” in the formula because retail rates vary within states and change over time.

It’s unclear whether the commission will take up the matter. In any event, Clark — who joined the commission after Order 745 — likely won’t be around to see it relitigated, having announced last month that he won’t seek reappointment when his term ends in June. (See Clark Won’t Seek New FERC Term.)

demand response

ISO-NE Resumes Work to Integrate DR into Energy Market

Two other cases dropped off FERC’s to-do list last week as a result of the Supreme Court ruling. On Friday, FirstEnergy (EL14-55) and the New England Power Generators Association (EL15-21) withdrew complaints they had filed seeking to bar DR from participating in the PJM and ISO-NE capacity markets, respectively.

ISO-NE spokeswoman Marcia Blomberg said Monday the ruling will allow the RTO to resume its work to “fully integrate” DR into all of the RTO’s markets, including the day-ahead and real-time energy and operating reserves. The RTO had suspended work on the project because of the legal challenge.

“We will work to accomplish this by June 1, 2018, on the schedule we worked out with our stakeholders to ensure a reliable transition through implementation of well-designed market rules and thoroughly tested modifications of energy management software.”

Once integration is complete, DR will offer into the day-ahead market alongside generators and be subject to the same Pay-for-Performance incentives.

Currently, small levels of DR participate in the RTO’s energy markets, but their offers are cleared administratively and not in the market, Blomberg said. DR and energy efficiency resources have been participating in the RTO’s capacity market since it began in 2010.

PJM, MISO: Business as Usual

For PJM and MISO, meanwhile, the ruling meant mostly business as usual.

PJM General Counsel Vince Duane started off last Thursday’s Markets and Reliability Committee meeting with some comments about what the ruling will change for PJM. In a word: “Nothing.”

“We have not done anything to change the status prior to this. The Tariff is as the Tariff has been,” he said. “DR has cleared, it has future obligations. It’s really business as usual.”

He told members not to be concerned over the fact that the ruling returns the matter to the D.C. Circuit, calling it a formality.

Duane’s counterpart at MISO, Senior Vice President of Legal and Compliance Service Steve Kozey, had the same message. Most of MISO’s DR assets are managed through state programs, and Kozey said state laws won’t have to be adjusted in the MISO footprint.

Kozey said he felt comfortable talking about the order in open session because MISO wasn’t a party to it and won’t be directly affected. “It was a big deal to PJM [and] New England … where a great deal of turmoil and uncertainty has been brought to an end,” he said.

Little Impact on PJM Capacity Market

Despite the ruling, DR participation is unlikely to increase in PJM’s capacity auctions, Morningstar analyst Jordan Grimes said in a Jan. 25 research report, noting that “almost all other PJM rule changes have been more restrictive to DR.” Under Capacity Performance rules, DR will be required to respond year-round and, like generation, will face high penalties for nonperformance. Lead times were cut to 30 minutes with an hour minimum dispatch.

“Ultimately DR market saturation will be the limiting factor. The more DR in PJM the more likely it is that the resource will be dispatched,” he wrote. “Because DR providers receive more than 90% of their revenues from the capacity market and the mainstream revenues from other economic activity (i.e. producing steel, cement), it is unlikely that DR providers will submit offers competitive with physical generation.”

The ruling is unlikely to have a significant impact on PJM energy and capacity prices, Grimes said. In contrast, capacity prices could have moved to the net cost of new entry price cap had the court vacated Order 745 and the market needed to replace DR, he said.

New York, ERCOT

ERCOT spokeswoman Robbie Searcy noted that the grid operator is not regulated by FERC and thus was not affected by the ruling. “Demand response continues to be an important tool in ERCOT, and our stakeholders continue to evaluate other opportunities for these resources to participate in the wholesale energy market.”

The order also had no evident impact in New York. As part of its Reforming the Energy Vision initiative, the New York Public Service Commission last June approved rules for utilities to offer customers financial payments for DR (14-E-0423, et al.). The retail programs, modeled after those in place at Consolidated Edison, will begin in some areas in July with a full rollout planned for summer 2017. (See Demand Response for All Coming to New York.)

See related stories:

— Suzanne Herel, Amanda Durish Cook, Tom Kleckner and William Opalka contributed to this article.

Legal Challenge Behind it, DR Seeks to Overcome Behavioral Resistance, Varying State Rules

By Rich Heidorn Jr.

Having survived a legal challenge that could have crimped its development for years, demand response now has an opportunity to take a central role in combating climate change and reducing energy bills by taking advantage of the growing spread of advanced metering technology.

But the industry still faces formidable challenges due to varying state regulations and consumer resistance to time-of-use pricing, hurdles the Supreme Court’s Jan. 25 ruling upholding FERC’s authority to regulate wholesale DR did nothing to eliminate. (See Supreme Court Upholds FERC Jurisdiction over DR.)

“While the Supreme Court ruling puts federal regulators at the helm of modernizing the electric grid — at least for the 70% of the country operating in deregulated electric markets — individual states can still restrict or set strict criteria for participation in those DR markets, which in some cases are increasingly restrictive,” said EnerKnol policy analyst Erin Carson in a research report released Monday.

Reflecting that sober assessment, shares of DR provider EnerNOC, which jumped 70% on the day of the ruling, retreated soon after, ending the week up 26%.

“Without establishment of price signals to customers, DR cannot fulfill its potential,” concluded a report released a week before the Supreme Court ruling by the Evolution of DR Project (EDP).

“The vast majority of residential customers are not exposed to price signals,” said the report, the result of a “multi-party dialogue” that included utilities, RTOs, state and federal policymakers, DR providers and other stakeholders.

Impact of Supreme Court Ruling

Although the Supreme Court case dealt explicitly with DR in wholesale energy markets, many observers predicted a rejection by the court would also jeopardize the resource’s participation in the capacity markets, where DR earns most of its revenue. (See related story, Clark Calls for New Look at Order 745.)

Kevin Lucas, director of research for the Alliance to Save Energy, noted that DR revenue is essential to justifying investments in data analytics and building controls. “Fair, market-based compensation in competitive wholesale energy markets is a critical step toward increasing the deployment of energy-saving technologies such as whole-building controls and smart-grid-enabled analytics,” he said in a press release. “With major legal questions now resolved, the direct benefits to consumers of these products and services are sure to follow.”

“Business uncertainty about the outcome of the Supreme Court case has held innovators and implementers in limbo for months,” wrote Denis Du Bois, a clean technology consultant and host of the Energy Priorities radio program. “Not only was the future of demand response in question, but similar ideas for energy efficiency markets also had a foggy outlook. By upholding the order, the court has removed that uncertainty for demand response and clarified the future of energy efficiency as well.”

Smart Meter Deployment

If maximizing DR requires exposing consumers to price signals, it also requires smart meters, devices capable of two-way communication and capturing real-time usage.

The Obama administration spent more than $3 billion in stimulus funds on smart meters and other smart grid investments. And while the spread of the technology has been unmistakable, there is disagreement over the current penetration of smart meters.

demand response

Source: American Public Power Association

FERC’s ninth annual Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering report, released in December, cited Energy Information Administration data that put penetration at 30% through 2012. The Edison Foundation’s Institute for Electric Innovation reported that more than 50 million smart meters were deployed as of July 2014, representing more than 43% of U.S. homes.

The EDP report estimates that about 70% of meters have been upgraded to smart meters or are planned for replacement in the near future, in line with projections by research group NPD, which predicted 75% by 2016.

FERC found the Texas Regional Entity leading with penetration of 70%, followed by the Western Electric Coordinating Council at 51%. Bringing up the rear were ReliabilityFirst Corp., which includes portions of PJM and MISO, at 17%, and the Northeast Power Coordinating Council at 12%.

Real-time Pricing

Despite the growing availability of smart meters, EDP noted that “at the residential level, nearly all customers are on retail rates that are fixed and do not vary with time or location.”

“Efficiently integrating new technologies such as storage and electric vehicles may require exposure to time-varying rates/prices to reflect the true marginal cost of power in each interval of time,” it said. “Without such time-varying rates/prices, the customer cannot know when inexpensive electricity should be bought and stored, and when the stored electricity should be utilized to avoid buying expensive electricity.”

But political aversion to price spikes and human nature has made it a challenge to make that vision a reality. Indeed, the FERC report found that enrollment in time-based DR programs dropped by 6.1% between 2011 and 2012.

demand response

A Department of Energy report last June looked at customer response to time-based rates based on studies of 10 utilities.

The utilities in the study ran at least one of four types of time-based rate programs: critical peak pricing (CPP), critical peak rebates (CPR), time-of-use (TOU) pricing and variable peak pricing (VPP).

The report concluded that opt-out enrollment rates were about 3.5 times higher than they were for opt-in programs (93% vs. 24%), but there was no significant difference in retention rates (91% for opt-out, 92% for opt-in).

The department report attributed the results to what social scientists call the “default bias.”

“When facing choices that include default options, people are predisposed to accept the default over the other options offered,” the Energy Department report said. The department said the findings indicate cost-benefit advantages to using opt-out approaches.

The Sacramento Municipal Utility District found, conversely, that peak period demand reductions for opt-in TOU customers were about twice (12%) as large as they were for opt-out customers (6%). Peak period demand reductions for SMUD’s opt-in CPP customers were about 50% higher (24%) than they were for opt-out customers (14%).

The study also found that retention rates were higher for critical peak rebates than for critical peak pricing.

This, the researchers said, was consistent with the theory of loss aversion, which holds that, given a choice, people are more likely to seek to avoid a loss rather than acquire a gain. “The risk from nonperformance during critical events under CPP is greater than under CPR, and this could be a motivating factor that decreases enrollment and retention,” the report said.

State Policies

Some states are attempting to overcome behavioral obstacles.

The California Public Utilities Commission is requiring the three investor-owned utilities in the state to establish default TOU rates for residential customers starting in 2019. The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities is requiring that load-serving entities implement time-varying rates as smart meters are deployed.

Last June, the Michigan Public Service Commission ordered DTE Electric and Consumers Energy to offer opt-in TOU and dynamic pricing rate structures over the next two years.

demand response

The EDP report cited complaints of DR providers and multi-state utilities over inconsistencies in DR rules from state to state and the complications of wholesale market programs that “can underlay or overlay” state DR programs.

It recommended that state-level policies on distribution platforms consider how distribution-level DR will be coordinated with regional wholesale DR. It also called for RTOs to participate in the proceedings that develop distribution-based market systems.

Some others say more action is needed to clarify federal and state jurisdiction. “My take is that [the Supreme Court] decision can guide the development of demand response, but we still need congressional action (and perhaps a broader Supreme Court decision) to update a U.S. electricity market framework that is over 80 years old,” wrote Varun Sivaram, an advisor to New York’s REV initiative.

See related stories:

A Half Century of DR

The Evolution of DR Project report provides a succinct history of demand response, beginning in the 1950s and 60s, when utilities began offering incentive-based “interruptible” programs to large commercial and industrial customers.

Between 1980 and 2000, direct load control programs offered savings to smaller customers through radio controls allowing utilities to turn off hot water heaters and air conditioning during peak demand.

The term “demand response” came into use after 2000, when the creation of ISOs and RTOs created “a new platform” for the resource, including market-based DR.

demand responseUsing new technology and directed by FERC policies, the RTOs “moved beyond emergency programs and began to incorporate DR as a market resource that could compete with supply resources. DR began to be viewed as a dynamic, controllable and dispatchable resource that could help balance supply and demand in a wholesale market.”

DR began providing ancillary services, including operating reserves and regulation.

Potential peak reduction in RTOs and ISOs grew to 6% of peak demand in 2013, from 5.6% in 2012, according to FERC’s annual Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering report in December. (See FERC Report Shows Spotty Growth for Demand Response, Advanced Meters.)

At the same time, utilities began installing advanced metering infrastructure — smart meters — that provided both more precise time-based measurement and two-way communications.

In contrast with traditional energy efficiency — making devices and equipment use less power — DR was “dynamic, controllable and dispatchable.”

A new term emerged — intelligent efficiency — to describe building technology that can respond to price or other inputs automatically.

In the last five years, DR backers have sought to ensure the resource has a role alongside rooftop solar and microgrids in the move to distributed energy resources.

See related stories:

From Negawatts to Flexiwatts

An August 2015 report by the Rocky Mountain Institute said that although the Supreme Court ruling would be “immensely important” for demand response, the industry was limited by “traditional, top-down grid paradigms.”

“By focusing on DR’s revenue potential in wholesale markets, a huge part of the core value proposition of demand flexibility is lost — namely, the economic benefits of flexible, controllable demand to individual customers,” it said.

The institute’s co-founder, Amory Lovins, is credited with inventing the term “negawatt” — power saved through conservation or efficiency.

The institute’s new report, The Economics of Demand Flexibility, coins a new term, “flexiwatts” — demand that can be moved across the hours of a day or night based on economic or other signals.

flexiwatt

The report concludes that residential demand flexibility can save $9 billion per year in spending on transmission investments — a cut of more than 10% of forecast spending — and $4 billion annually in energy production and ancillary services. That could reduce consumers’ electric bills by 10% to 40%.

Flexiwatts can reduce capacity spending by reducing peak loads and flattening aggregate demand profiles of customers. In the energy market it can shift load from high-price to low-price times. They can also reshape load profiles to complement the increasing intermittent generation expected in response to EPA’s Clean Power Plan.

While DR is deployed infrequently and often used only as a last resort during peak demand, demand flexibility can be used continuously and proactively to reduce costs year-round, resulting in direct bill reductions instead of infrequent incentive payments.

Demand flexibility can use automatic controls to reshape a customer’s demand profile in ways that either are invisible to the customer (for example, using storage to decouple the timing of consumption from the grid impact) or minimally affect the customer (shifting the timing of non-critical loads within customer-set thresholds).

It also takes advantage of time-of-use or real-time pricing, demand charges and distributed solar PV export pricing to provide retail price signals directly to customers or through third-party aggregators.

See related stories:

 

MISO Plans Expansion of Carmel HQ

By Amanda Durish Cook

CARMEL, Ind. — MISO revealed Thursday that it plans to increase its employee headcount and invest $30 million to update its Carmel, Ind., headquarters. The grid operator said it’s in need of an expansion because it has outgrown the 133,409-square-foot facility that has served as its headquarters for more than a decade.

miso
MISO’s headquarters at 720 City Center Drive in Carmel, Ind.

Over the next four years, MISO said it could add more than 80 employees to its workforce. The RTO hopes to gradually open 84 new positions by 2020 in order to qualify for $1.6 million in conditional tax credits and up to $100,000 in training grants offered by the Indiana Economic Development Corp. Final approval on both the employee additions and building expansion rests with MISO’s Board of Directors.

MISO spokesperson Andy Shonert said MISO’s investment plans are based on projections that are subject to performance-based checks. He noted that “future investment and headcount decisions are approved by the Board of Directors during the annual budget process.”

“The investment numbers cited encompass a number of priorities that MISO has worked on with stakeholders, including reconfiguring our Carmel location to better support our workforce, meeting critical technology needs and lease payments for our office building,” Shonert said, adding, “MISO always seeks to ensure we are good stewards of our members’ resources.”

A large portion of the expansion investment will go toward updating MISO’s facilities and IT and computer networking systems.

If the employee goal is reached, the city of Carmel said it would consider additional incentives, although the “city rarely offers additional benefits,” according to the Indianapolis Business Journal.

MISO’s decision followed deliberations that began last fall on whether to expand or move into new headquarters.

“Indiana has been our home since we first started, and we are proud to continue that investment,” MISO CEO John Bear said in a press release issued by the Indiana Economic Development Corp. “Fulfilling our mission of ensuring reliable operation of the electric grid requires the best and the brightest. This commitment to our Carmel facility will ensure that we have the people and technology to continue that mission in a way that provides value to our region.”

Of MISO’s 940 employees nationwide, more than 700 work in Indiana.

“We congratulate MISO on its big news today and we celebrate the fact that they chose to expand here in Carmel,” said Carmel Mayor Jim Brainard. “MISO has been a part of Carmel’s corporate family of 100-plus headquarters since the late 1990s and we look forward to watching their continued growth.”

In the meantime, and as part of the improvements, MISO is undergoing an audio-visual overhaul at its Carmel location. MISO Conference Services Manager Mike Barber said the top priority is to “enhance the stakeholder experience” of meetings. Barber said MISO is installing state-of-the-art audio-visual equipment that will include allowing telecommuting stakeholders a presentation view of meetings.

The audio-visual improvements will extend to MISO’s Eagan, Minn., location as well. Barber said construction at the Eagan facilities will begin on March 28 and last until May, while improvements to the Carmel facility began in late January and will last until April 11. Until then, meetings will be conducted offsite via telephone or at MISO’s Little Rock and Metairie, La., locations.

During a Tuesday meeting of the Markets Committee of the Board of Directors, Wisconsin Public Service’s Chris Plante asked if stakeholders will be required to use different software to view presentations online after the upgrade. Barber said that was something he couldn’t answer until pilot testing the new equipment.

At the MISO Steering Committee on Jan. 27, MISO Stakeholder Relations Specialist Alison Lane said a new conference call operator is coming on board in March. With the change, there will be no limit to how many callers can call into MISO meetings; currently the number is capped at about 150 callers. “That is all being folded into our AV update, which is slowly underway,” Lane said.

Lane said Board of Directors meetings and Advisory Committee meetings will continue to be operator-assisted, while all other meetings will not require an operator, “unless an issue arises.”

Company Briefs

Dominion Resources announced Monday that it is buying the Utah-based natural gas distributor Questar for $4.4 billion in cash in a deal aimed at expanding its gas business into the West.

Dominion said it expects to complete the acquisition by the end of the year. The company also said it would be assuming Questar’s approximately $1.31 billion in long- and short-term debt.

Like Duke Energy, which announced in October it would purchase Piedmont Natural Gas, Dominion expects the value of natural gas to increase as more and more states switch to the fuel for electric generation in order to meet state and federal emissions mandates.

It is Dominion’s latest big natural gas play. The company is one of the majority owners of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project, a $5 billion, 550-mile pipeline that would bring natural gas from the shale fields in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio to markets and terminals in Virginia and North Carolina.  It also has invested $3.8 billion to convert its liquefied natural gas import terminal at Cove Point, Md., on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay into an export facility.

More: Wall Street Journal (subscription required)

GPI Names Bilek to Govt. Affairs and Communications

GreatPlainsInstituteSourceGPIAmanda Bilek, who has held various positions at the Great Plains Institute since 2008, will become the director of government affairs and communications for the energy think tank.

“I look forward to the challenge of ensuring that our government affairs and communications efforts enhance the impact of our programs,” she said.

“Amanda’s extensive legislative and policy experience coupled with her management and communications skills make her a perfect fit for this new role,” said GPI President Rolf Nordstrom.

More: Great Plains Institute

Invenergy Cuts Deal to Sell Wind Energy to Google

RTO-InvenergyInvenergy announced it has signed a deal with Google to provide the Internet giant with 225 MW of wind energy.  Craig Gordon, Invenergy’s vice president of sales and marketing, said the power will be generated at the company’s proposed wind facility near Lubbock, Texas, and will be transmitted through SPP to Google’s energy-hungry data centers.

“They are always looking to partner up with folks like us to green up their energy supply,” Gordon said. “Their needs are growing by leaps and bounds every year, and as a result their energy needs are growing by leaps and bounds every year.” A price was not disclosed.

The agreement is part of a plan Google announced in December to partner with six companies in the U.S., Sweden and Chile to obtain 842 MW of clean energy.

More: Chicago Tribune

Duke Starts Coal Ash Removal from Riverbend Steam Station

Riverbend Steam Station (Source: Duke Energy)
Riverbend Steam Station (Source: Duke Energy)

Duke Energy began loading coal ash from its retired Riverbend Steam Station in Gaston County, N.C., using a rail spur it had built for the purpose. The company said each train can carry as much coal ash as 420 dump trucks, alleviating some of the community’s traffic concerns.

Riverbend, on the Catawba River, was retired in 2013, but the coal ash dump there is one of four high-priority sites that have to be cleaned up by 2019. Duke says it will clean up all its coal ash sites by 2029.

More: WSOC TV

Montana Co-ops May Be Facing $5B Bill to Comply with CPP

Montana’s electric cooperatives will likely share in a $5 billion bill to comply with the federal Clean Power Plan, officials said recently.

The $5 billion is what Basin Electric Power Cooperative, an SPP member, estimates it will need to cut greenhouse gases from its coal-fired power plants while also adding wind farms and gas-fired generators as replacement energy sources.

More: Billings Gazette

Basin Electric Growth Rate Projected to Drop to 1.4% Annually

BasinElectricPowerCoopSourceBasinBasin Electric Power Cooperative forecasts new load will increase 1,350 MW over the next 20 years, 739 MW lower than its forecast last year.

The forecast projects a 1.4% annual growth rate across Basin’s membership, down from the previous year’s estimate of 2.5 to 2.9% annually. The cancelled Keystone XL pipeline and oil price fluctuations account for much of the difference.

The load forecast show Basin Electric’s service area growing at twice the rate of the rest of the U.S., even with oil prices at 12-year lows.

More: Basin Electric Power Cooperative

PNM Opens 3rd Solar Facility This Year, Adding 9.5 MW

PubliServiceNewMexioSourcepnmPublic Service Company of New Mexico opened a 9.5-MW solar facility south of Santa Fe, its 15th in the state.

The 40,000-panel solar center is part of the utility’s much debated and critiqued energy portfolio, 15% of which is required by the state to be derived from renewable sources.

In December, the state Public Regulation Commission approved PNM’s plan to close two of four coal-burning units at the aging San Juan Generating Station and replace that power with energy from nuclear and natural gas plants, additional coal power and some solar energy.

More: The Santa Fe New Mexican

Nonprofit Says PNM Broke Law with 64-MW Palo Verde Purchase

An advocacy group is fighting a requested rate increase by Public Service Company of New Mexico, which it says quietly purchased a 64-MW share of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station in Arizona for $163.3 million without getting prior approval from state regulators. PNM previously had leased the capacity from the nuclear plant.

The nonprofit New Energy Economy filed a motion Jan. 20 with the state Public Regulation Commission, along with Bernalillo County, to dismiss a third of the utility’s requested $123.5 million rate hike that would cover the $40 million cost of operating Palo Verde’s Unit 2 for a year, including taxes, maintenance and fuel.

The advocacy group, which has been at odds with PNM for years, said that the utility should have submitted its proposed purchase first to the state commission. PNM said it filed the request in March with FERC, and no public comments were submitted.

More: The Santa Fe New Mexican

Austin Energy Proposes Rate Cut for Most Businesses

AustinEnergySourceAustinEnergyAustin Energy has proposed cutting rates for most business customers to reduce revenue by $17.5 million a year.

Austin Energy officials publicly released their suggested rates Jan. 25 in what is shaping up to be a contentious discussion about reallocating costs among different customer classes.

The utility, which has 448,000 customers, says that residential customers as a whole are paying $53 million less than it costs to serve them, while businesses collectively are paying about $62 million more. Its new rates require City Council approval.

More: Austin American-Statesman

Akron Delves into Battery Storage with Solar Project

DesignFluxSourceDesignFluxSmart battery builder Design Flux Technologies, a University of Akron spinoff, is building a battery-management system for a rooftop solar array being built in Akron, Ohio.

The facility will be built by Prism Solar Technology of Highland, N.Y., and will be affixed to the roof of the former B.F. Goodrich Tire plant, a 19th century building that now houses the Akron Global Business Accelerator, a business development organization. Design Flux Technologies is a resident company of the Akron Global Business Accelerator.

The city of Akron’s $173,000 investment in the solar panels and storage equipment is expected to be recovered within five years, with power cost savings estimated between $30,000 and $40,000 annually.

More: Crain’s Cleveland Business

WEC Energy to Replace Retiring CEO with Current President

Leverett
Leverett

WEC Energy Group announced last week that current president Allen Leverett will succeed Gale Klappa as chief executive on May 1.

Klappa, 65, is retiring and will serve as nonexecutive chairman. Leverett, 49, was recruited to WEC by Klappa in 2003 after the two worked together at Georgia Power in Atlanta.

The incoming CEO said his priorities will include the continued transition of the Integrys merger, working on upgrades as needed to WEC’s natural gas distribution infrastructure and compliance with Wisconsin’s Clean Power Plan strategy.

More: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Exelon Appoints Gioia to Board of Directors

nancygioiasourcenancygioia
Gioia

Nancy Gioia, retired director of global connectivity, electrical and user experience for Ford Motor Co., has been appointed to Exelon’s board of directors, effective Feb. 1.

Gioia, 55, will serve on the generation oversight and finance and risk committees.

In more than 30 years at Ford, Gioia led global electrification efforts, working closely with the Edison Electric Institute and the Department of Energy.

More: Exelon

PECO: Smart Ideas Program Increasing Energy Efficiency

PECOSourceExelonPECO Energy customers have received more than $500 million in energy savings, incentives and rebates in the past seven years using the Smart Ideas program, the Philadelphia utility says.

The program provides 15 ways to help residential and business customers save energy and money.

Smart Ideas is part of the company’s effort to increase energy efficiency and demand response capability under the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission’s Act 129, which requires electric utilities to increasingly reduce their customers’ energy usage through 2021.

More: PECO

FirstEnergy: Lake Shore Power Plant to be Demolished

LakeShorePowerSourceFEFirstEnergy engineers say the architecturally significant, defunct Lake Shore power plant in Cleveland is too degraded to restore and will be demolished.

The coal-fired plant, which first generated power in 1911, sits on 57 acres overlooking Lake Erie.

FirstEnergy hopes to begin the $15 million demolition in late spring or early summer, and then offer the cleared site for sale. But the utility can’t proceed with demolition until the city’s Downtown/Flats Design Review Committee issues a permit.

More: The Plain Dealer

$1B Privately Funded Plant will Power 1M Ill. Homes

CompetitivePowerSourceCompetitiveCompetitive Power Ventures plans to open a 1,100-MW combined cycle generating facility in the Three Rivers area of Grundy County, Ill.

The $1 billion CPV Three Rivers Energy Center will consist of two General Electric turbines and one steam turbine. It will be fueled by an existing 36-inch natural gas pipeline on the 80-acre site. The site is near Exelon’s Dresden Generating Station in Goose Lake Township.

Construction is expected to start in 2018, with the facility in operation by 2021.

More: Morris Herald-News

Entergy Names 30-Year Industry Vet to Lead its Nuclear Operations

Chris Bakken will become Entergy’s executive vice president and chief nuclear officer, effective April 6. Bakken replaces Jeff Forbes, who announced his retirement last year, and will report to Leo Denault, Entergy’s chairman and chief executive.

Bakken will be responsible for oversight of New Orleans-based Entergy’s 10 nuclear units at eight sites, which have nearly 10,000 MW of capacity. He will also be responsible for the company’s management services to the Cooper Nuclear Station for the Nebraska Public Power District.

Bakken’s career began in 1982 as a test engineer at Duquesne Light in Pittsburgh. He was most recently executive director for EDF Energy’s nuclear new build group and has also worked for American Electric Power, Public Service Enterprise Group and British Energy.

More: Entergy

ISO-NE Could See Worse Supply Crunch in 2 Years

By William Opalka

New England’s winter energy supply crunch could be worse in two years because the closure of the Brayton Point coal-fired plant and the potential retirement of the Pilgrim nuclear plant will come before additional natural gas pipelines can fill the gap.

“The winter of 2017-2018 is the one that worries me the most, because we will have lost Brayton Point at that point, [and] there’s a question mark about whether Pilgrim is available,” said CEO Gordon van Welie during ISO-NE’s annual “State of the Grid” media briefing last week.

Entergy Closing Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.)

The RTO’s performance incentives to make additional generation available won’t go into effect until mid-2018. Two proposed large-capacity natural gas pipelines, Northeast Energy Direct and Access Northeast, won’t be ready to serve New England until 2018 at the earliest.

“This will be a period of vulnerability,” van Welie added.

Non-gas generation is finding it increasingly difficult to compete in the energy market, van Welie said.

“During most of the year, the low price of natural gas is setting the wholesale price of electric energy, so power plants using more expensive fuels are getting squeezed financially. As a result, more and more non-natural gas-fired generators are retiring,” he said.

iso-ne

Van Welie

For the third consecutive year, the RTO will use its winter reliability program, which rewards dual-fuel gas/oil generators.

Meanwhile, higher capacity prices have attracted new investment. Capacity auction revenues have quadrupled from about $1 billion three years ago to $4 billion last year. Since auctions for those supplies are held three years in advance, customers have so far been shielded and will not see those price hikes for another year, he said.

Forward Capacity Auction 10, for the 2018/19 period, will be held Feb. 8. Van Welie said 147 new resources, totaling 6,700 MW of new generation, demand response and energy efficiency capacity, have qualified to participate.